Skip to comments.
Microsoft "may have to lower prices"
Inquirer ^
| 04 February 2003
| Inquirer staff
Posted on 02/04/2003 1:32:12 AM PST by JameRetief
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; rdb3
And the pendulum begins its reverse swing ping!
To: JameRetief
Microsoft has become the Alfred E. Newman of the Linux world.
3
posted on
02/04/2003 1:37:13 AM PST
by
per loin
To: JameRetief
As Garret Morris would say, "Competition has been very very good to prices!"
Do I hear Windows XP for $19.95?
To: JameRetief
Microsoft "may have to lower prices"Maybe if they hadn't outsourced all those decent paying American jobs, more people could afford to pay the higher price.
Payback's a b*tch, isn't it, Bill?
5
posted on
02/04/2003 2:19:15 AM PST
by
Caipirabob
([Formerly: Yakboy] Democrat.. Socialist..Commie..Traitor...Who can tell the difference?)
To: JameRetief
When Microsoft began it was a decent company with integrity. With the passage of time it has become an arrogant abomination.
6
posted on
02/04/2003 2:37:37 AM PST
by
RLK
To: JameRetief
Gee, what a surprise!?! I always though MS Office was a real bargain at $450. < /sarcasm>
To: RLK
With the new subscription activation policy, MS is making more by selling less, so as a smart move they now lower prices to constrain other market competition. They have so much cash they are embarrassed about it.
8
posted on
02/04/2003 2:56:41 AM PST
by
doosee
To: JameRetief
The problem with this industry isn't Micorsoft but small third party software houses who crank out crappy software drivers/installation packages for hardware add-ons.
That's why Microsoft instituted a program to certify third party software having been tested with XP.
By the way most third party software is still not XP certified which is evidenced by a warning when it is installed on your computer.
BUMP
9
posted on
02/04/2003 3:10:55 AM PST
by
tm22721
(Those without a sword can still die upon it.)
To: RLK
When Microsoft began it was a decent company with integrity. You mean when they sold IBM an operating system they didn't have?
10
posted on
02/04/2003 3:21:43 AM PST
by
Straight Vermonter
(I don't believe in hyphenating Americans)
To: doosee
definitely.
This is just another marketing strategery
To: RLK
"When Microsoft began it was a decent company with integrity. With the passage of time it has become an arrogant abomination." Hey, it happens to virtually ALL companies as they get bigger and the suits take over. Concern for customers and employees goes out the window as the bean-counters start looking for a "magic fix" to drastically increase profits--while the truly GOOD companies just keep on succeeding.
To: Rain-maker
Why would you pay $20 for junk? I gave my copy away.
13
posted on
02/04/2003 3:37:39 AM PST
by
RWG
To: Straight Vermonter
Haha. Or when they then bought up some independent programmers code right after that and gave it to IBM.
14
posted on
02/04/2003 4:01:43 AM PST
by
College Repub
(http://www.collegehumor.com)
To: JameRetief
This is why antitrust lawsuits are a bunch of crap.
Eventually, "monopolies" take care of themselves.
The two biggest ones in the country, microsoft, timewarner/aol are taking it in right now, just proving the point.
Who will be next? Should be the real question.
To: doosee
"With the new subscription activation policy, MS is making more by selling less, so as a smart move they now lower prices to constrain other market competition. They have so much cash they are embarrassed about it." I think not. A lot of folks (myself included) simply WILL NOT put up with the "subscription application" bullbleep. I will continue to run Windows 98 for the foreseeable future, and then make the jump to Linux. I was a satisified user of Microsoft software for MANY years (I first used Windows before it was available as a separate product, as a "run-time" accessory to Micrografx "In-A-Vision" drawing software (later succeeded by Micrografx Designer).
The day my CAD package runs under Linux (via Codeweavers), or I find an acceptable native Linux substitute, Microsoft will have seen its last dollar from me.
To: Rain-maker
Competition? But a US Court ruled MS had no competitors. This must be a farce because most of the linux heads I spoke to said MS must be broken up to fairly compete with them.
17
posted on
02/04/2003 5:08:58 AM PST
by
for-q-clinton
((If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed))
To: JameRetief
Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww....... ;-)
To: Rain-maker
"Do I hear Windows XP for $19.95?" Make that $19.95 for XP Pro and $12.95 for the home edition.
Let them split off SQL server if they want, I don't grudge them the R&D cost recovery that will be necessary with the advent of a new dawn in cyber crime - especially cyber-terror crime aimed at the U.S.
But they'd better hurry - all Linux needs to go mainstream is a driver set on par with Windoze to better support gaming hardware and digital image editing.
Let the poor, poor employees of M$ and it's shareholders come back down to earth - the days of price goudging the world for an OS that is no longer the safest or most reliable are history.
Capitalism *does* have it's blessings . . .
H2BeMe
19
posted on
02/04/2003 5:45:42 AM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(It's All About You - It's All About Me - It's All About Being Free!)
To: RWG
"Why would you pay $20 for junk? I gave my copy away." Which version of Linux is on your box?
20
posted on
02/04/2003 5:46:56 AM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(It's All About You - It's All About Me - It's All About Being Free!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson