To: Quix
GIVEN THE *YEARS* OF EXTREME HYPERBOLE ON THE PART OF MICROSOFT--AT CUSTOMERS' EXPENSE . . . . I think Linux lovers ought to be allowed some loud crowing.
Point me at some reference where MS has ever claimed that Windows can't crash.
27 posted on
02/08/2003 8:30:41 AM PST by
Bush2000
To: Bush2000
THEIR OVERALL GESTALT, ADVERTISING, DEMEANOR, ETC.
HOLD THEMSELVES OUT AS
THE CAT'S MEOW; THE BEGINNING AND ENDING OF THE BEST, MOST WONDERFUL, MOST/ONLY USEFUL, MOST INNOVATIVE; MOST STABLE ETC. ETC. ETC. ETC.
SOFTWARE AVAILABLE IN THE GALAXY.
If you haven't gotten that flavor from them, perhaps you haven't been paying close attention.
They wouldn't dare claim it would never crash--they'd be sued by a host of angry customers.
The Linux fellow was clearly speaking slight exaggeration or hyperbole. Nevertheless, my Linux friends report MUCH, MUCH, MUCH LESS CRASHING than my very robust WINDUD systems.
28 posted on
02/08/2003 9:35:13 AM PST by
Quix
(21st FREEPCARD FINISHED--going to get back to it soonish)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson