[robertpaulsen]

You're the first to argue for smoking a substance containing over 400 chemicals, of which one or many of them (and which one and how many) may have an effect on an illness.

When I see you pushing for medical THC (or one of 399 other chemicals) instead of medical marijuana, I'll make the alcohol distinction.

[kinghorse]

I don't think anyone is arguing for someone else doing something against their own free will. People freely take of the habit of cigarette smoking with the full knowledge it will probably be the single most powerful factor leading to premature death.

What was you point again?

[MrLeRoy]

When I see you pushing for medical THC (or one of 399 other chemicals) instead of medical marijuana, I'll make the alcohol distinction.

So FreeTally argues for the medical availability of a single plant that contains 400 active chemicals, and you think that justifies your treating as identical two chemicals that do not naturally occur together? Seldom have I seen a more dishonest argument.

[realpatriot71]

When I see you pushing for medical THC (or one of 399 other chemicals) instead of medical marijuana, I'll make the alcohol distinction.

Unless you're downing 100% grain alcohol distilled in a lab, you're also advocating the use of more than one chemical, ethanol being one.

Damn that logical consistancy!