Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cynderbean
Isn't there still the option to abort the flight after launch before the shuttle leaves the earths atmosphere? I know that time is short in that margin but it seems there would be some sort of contingency or emergency procedures that would apply.

Yes, liftoffs can be aborted up to a certain point:


Space Shuttle Transoceanic Abort Landing (TAL) Sites
FS-2001-05-012-KSC


Planning for each Space Shuttle mission includes provisions for an unscheduled landing at contingency landing sites in the U.S. and overseas. Several unscheduled landing scenarios are possible, ranging from adverse weather conditions at the primary and secondary landing sites to mechanical problems during the ascent and mission phases that would require emergency return of the orbiter and its crew. The Transoceanic Abort Landing (TAL) is one mode of unscheduled landing. The orbiter would have to make an unscheduled landing if one or more of its three main engines failed during ascent into orbit, or if a failure of a major orbiter system, such as the cooling or cabin pressurization systems, precluded satisfactory continuation of the mission.

Several unscheduled landing scenarios are possible with about modes available that include: Return to Launch Site (RTLS); East Coast Abort Landing (ECAL) Site; Transoceanic Abort Landing (TAL); Abort Once Around (AOA); and Abort to Orbit (ATO). The abort mode would depend on when in the ascent phase an abort became necessary.

The TAL abort mode was developed to improve the options available if failure occurred after the last opportunity for a safe Return To Launch Site (RTLS) or East Coast Abort Landing (ECAL), but before the Abort Once Around (AOA) option became available. A TAL would be declared between roughly T+2:30 minutes (liftoff plus 2 minutes, 30 seconds) and Main Engine Cutoff (MECO), about T+8:30 minutes, with the exact time depending on the payload and mission profile.

Launch Site - Cape Canaveral TAL Site - Gambia TAL Site - Morocco Two TAL Sites - Spain Four TAL SitesA TAL would be made at one of four designated sites, two in Africa and two in Spain: Ben Guerir Air Base, Morocco; Banjul International Airport, The Gambia; Zaragoza Air Base, Spain, and Moron Air Base, Spain.

Each TAL site is covered by a separate international agreement. The TAL sites are referred to as augmented sites because they are equipped with Shuttle-unique landing aids and are staffed with NASA, contractor and Department of Defense personnel during a launch and contingency landing.

Space Shuttles are launched eastward over the Atlantic Ocean from KSC for insertion into equatorial orbits. Depending on mission requirements, an orbiter follows and orbital insertion inclination between 28.5 degrees (low) and 57.0 degrees (high) to the equator. The lower inclination launch allows for a higher maximum payload weight.

High or low inclination launches require different contingency landing sites, with three of the four landing sites staffed to ensure there is acceptable weather for a safe landing at a TAL site.

During a TAL abort, the orbiter continues on a trajectory across the Atlantic to a predetermined runway at one of the TAL sites. The four sites NASA has designated as TAL sites have been chosen in part because they are near the nominal ascent ground track of the orbiter, which would allow the most efficient use of main engine propellant and cross-range steering capability.

So it would appear they would have had plenty of time to land somewhere, but the question is: How soon did the engineers notice that piece of foam coming off the tank? And if they did see it in time, did they realize the seriousness of it soon enough, or did they think it was just a routine piece of ice falling off or somesuch?
75 posted on 02/03/2003 6:33:44 AM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Timesink
bump
91 posted on 02/03/2003 6:37:42 AM PST by TLBSHOW (God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
Very informative. Thank you : )
99 posted on 02/03/2003 6:39:51 AM PST by Cynderbean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

To: Timesink
"How soon did the engineers notice that piece of foam coming off the tank?"

This wan't noticed until launch videos were being screened the day after the launch. The shuttle was already in orbit and beginning experiments.

130 posted on 02/03/2003 6:52:41 AM PST by Mark Felton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson