Skip to comments.
BREAKING: NBC News finds Jan 30 NASA Memo showing serious concern about tile damage!
NBC News
| February 3, 2003
| Jay Barbree
Posted on 02/03/2003 6:03:22 AM PST by Timesink
Developing. Watch MSNBC for latest. Internal memo shows some engineers believe there was up to a 7 1/2-inch gash from the foam breakoff at launch. Memo was serious enough to go out to all NASA centers two days before disaster.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: columbia; columbiatragedy; feb12003; msnbc; nasa; nbcnews; shuttle; shuttletragedy; spaceshuttle; sts107
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 881-887 next last
To: HairOfTheDog
I am not in charge but I see major problems at NASA for years!
http://www.nasaproblems.com/
This webpage is an information mechanism for solutions to NASA's human space projects problems. Members of the American aerospace community are encouraged to use this webpage as an instrument to openly express constructive concerns and solutions for the problems at NASA. No names will be used unless requested............. "Speak out... or forever suffer the consequences of remaining silent"
Don A. Nelson, Coordinator ......... Retired NASA Aerospace Engineer
Issues:
International Space Station
Petition to Congress for "No" vote on NASA's Integrated Space Transportation Plan
Petition provides information on why the NASA plan will accelerate the collapse of the human space program.
Space Shuttle Safety
Space Shuttle Safety Moratorium
Requests Presidential executive order for Shuttle flights... Reply... Justifications.
NASA Headquarters Space Shuttle Safety Letters and Replies
Attempts to get crew escape modules on Shuttle... Comments on replies.
"NASAs gambling, again, with a teacher's safety", By Don A. Nelson
Houston Chronicle article Apr. 19 2002... Comments... Replies.
Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel Annual Report for 2000
ASAP recommends new crew escape system as soon as possible.
NASA Human Space Program Management Solutions
NASA Directives for 21st Century
Based
121
posted on
02/03/2003 6:48:33 AM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: bootyist-monk
Sorry... life is not a Bruce Willis movie.Puh-leeze. I never suggested anything like what hollywierd threw at us in Armageddon.
Let's get back on topic.
122
posted on
02/03/2003 6:49:10 AM PST
by
al_c
To: rs79bm
1) we could have sent up Atlantis to get them, which would have been capable of launch...There's no way another shuttle could have been launched in time. They're not airplanes; you can't just open the hangar door and have them off the ground twenty minutes later. It would have taken weeks.
To: Fitzcarraldo
7 Light at the End of the Tunnel?
NASA must change its operating philosophy or that light at the end of the tunnel will be an approaching freight train!
124
posted on
02/03/2003 6:49:58 AM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: mabelkitty
I copied it and put it on a post here, In case!
125
posted on
02/03/2003 6:50:44 AM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: DCPatriot
How in the hell...after all these advances in technology, are the insulation tiles *STILL* glued on with silicone?
Why isn't the entire Orbiter's belly ONE PIECE??
So that if one tile is damaged it can be replaced. Can you imagine the budget problems if they had to replace the WHOLE underside of the shuttle after every flight? Also- a cracked tile does not instantly spell death for all aboard. The real problem will be if the crack was determined to be past TOLERANCES. Anyone who has worked on any kind of aircraft can tell you that they fly with missing fasteners, cracked skins, leaking fluid all the time. It is about the tolerances, not the actual defect.
To: Kevin Curry
Now it may very well turn out that the shuttle disaster could have been readily and resposibly avoided had one of these safety experts been listened to. If so, the parties responsible should suffer stiff consequences. But knee-jerking ourselves to a conclusion at this early stage that the shuttles were made and maintained in a decrepit junkyard by devil-may-care teenagers and delinquents whose last consideration was safety is counterproductive and foolish.I admire your fair approach, except I would not even dream of punishing the parties yet. A judgment call was made that could have gone either way. There has to be a reasonable man test. Could a reasonable man have weighed the same evidence and made the call they did? - We don't know if that falling foam is even the cause yet. We can't forget that. It might be, it might just be what the media thinks is the cause. NASA is being much more methodical than the media. But then, they have to be right. The media doesn't.
127
posted on
02/03/2003 6:52:00 AM PST
by
HairOfTheDog
(I stayed at a Holiday Inn last night.)
To: Timesink
Russia sent a food ship up yesterday! Did you catch that story?
128
posted on
02/03/2003 6:52:03 AM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
To: bvw
Excellent point.
129
posted on
02/03/2003 6:52:20 AM PST
by
Lee'sGhost
(To BOLDLY go . . . (no whimpy libs allowed).)
To: Timesink
"How soon did the engineers notice that piece of foam coming off the tank?"This wan't noticed until launch videos were being screened the day after the launch. The shuttle was already in orbit and beginning experiments.
To: anniegetyourgun
Sadly...even if true, there is almost nothing that could have been done once launched. Perhaps nothing could be done to save the shuttle, but the crew could be saved by joining the orbiting space station.
To: TLBSHOW
Are you possibly over-reacting based onwhat we know so far?
According to NBC flight expert Robert Hager, the memo now being discussed, did NOT state that there was a 2 1/2 foot gash in the tiles. Hager states that the the group of engineers who were asked to study the take-off problem, sent their memo back to NASA two days before re-entry, and the memo states there could be damage to the heat tiles of that size. Hager says the The memo states the damage "COULD POSSIBLY be that large. That's the information NASA had.
I'm not splitting hairs, but at times like this, it's typical of the media...in this case, MSNBC, to hype the known information into conspiratorial, intentional, misdeeds on the part of NASA.
I urge restraint. Especially since NASA commissioned the outside engineering group to study the ramifications of the take-off problem on re-entry safety. They weren't ignoring a possibly serious problem. And it's not as if they had the information right after take-off and callously allowed the flight to continue knowing the astronauts might die upon re-entry.
And we certainly don't know information was withheld from the astronauts.
I watched Jay Barbree restate what he had found out this morning, about the memo. What Barbree said and what MSNBC anchors (and IMUS), imply by their questions, are two different things.
132
posted on
02/03/2003 6:53:09 AM PST
by
YaYa123
To: Dave S
Okay Maximus, with nothing they could do to save the astronauts, did you want NASA to tell them immediately it was a one way trip thus putting a damper over the trip of a lifetime for many of the crew. They could have saved the astronauts by fixing a known problem before the shuttle taken off, that is negligence.
With no purpose for telling them, I think NASA did the right thing to withhold the information.
I feel so much better knowing that...don't you? Wonder what would happen if a nuclear/biological attack was immenant..say in your area...and you could have taken measures to preserve your life and the life of your family, but YOU weren't provided any information? Oh...thats right, you wouldn't know the difference anyway...cause you'd be dead.
133
posted on
02/03/2003 6:53:31 AM PST
by
BureaucratusMaximus
(if we're not going to act like a constitutional republic...lets be the best empire we can be...)
To: TLBSHOW
So what are you implying? Be explicit.
To: steve in DC
My ongoing question is this: If the tiles were damaged on take-off, and if the damage and its severity were known within moments of take-off, and if there were no in-flight method of repair to the damaged shuttle, would there have been a reasonable abort option during the take-off?Yes. See my post #75 in this thread. Assuming all those "ifs" proved true, particularly "if they recognized the severity in time," they may have had up to 8 1/2 minutes after liftoff to abort, depending on the particularities of this individual mission.
To: Timesink
There's no way another shuttle could have been launched in time. They're not airplanes; you can't just open the hangar door and have them off the ground twenty minutes later. It would have taken weeks. EXACTLY!!
136
posted on
02/03/2003 6:53:53 AM PST
by
Mo1
(I Hate The Party of Bill Clinton)
To: Timesink
just in general would have required NASA to be granted a level of divine luck a couple of orders of magnitude above what it took to save Apollo XIII. I respectfully disagree.
There is a huge amount that could have been done.
Clearly apologists for the fatalist attitude are now taking to the airwaves lending support to the eventual "official conclusion" to be taken by NASA.
To: Fitzcarraldo
I am sorry if I offended you, but what exactly did I say that was so bad.
Becky
To: al_c
Dock at the space station and return on the Soyuz capsule The Columbia is physically incapable of docking at the space station. The Columbia is too heavy. Second, the Columbia was at a lower orbit and didnt have enough fuel to take it up to the higher level and catch the ISS (this isnt Star Trek). Third, the escape pod on the ISS only carries three and one of those would have to be the Russian on board the station who can pilot it. Astronauts who have been on board the ISS have quipped it would have to be one hell of an emergency for them to risk return using the escape pod. They dont trust it.
139
posted on
02/03/2003 6:54:15 AM PST
by
Dave S
To: Timesink
NASA veteran warned of disaster
Feb. 2 What NASA did and didnt do is the question that has been worrying many space agency insiders since long before Saturdays disaster. That growing chorus of concern has a loud voice in Houston. Don Nelson was at NASA for 36 years, part of the team for shuttles initial design and upgrades until he retired in 1999. His major concern has been that as the shuttle fleet aged, and the possibility of a disaster grew stronger, NASA still hadnt designed a way for those aboard to safely escape. NBCs Stone Phillips spoke to Nelson.
http://www.msnbc.com/news/867888.asp?0cv=CA01
140
posted on
02/03/2003 6:54:35 AM PST
by
TLBSHOW
(God Speed as Angels trending upward dare to fly Tribute to the Risk Takers)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 881-887 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson