Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The dangers of space travel
BBC News ^ | Feb. 2, 2003 | Jonathan Duffy

Posted on 02/01/2003 11:56:53 PM PST by FairOpinion

The dangers of space travel

Man's desire to conquer space has had a human cost

By Jonathan Duffy BBC News Online

The shuttle tragedy is an unwelcome reminder that 40 years after the first manned space flight, the dangers persist. Since 1961, when Yuri Gagarin became the first human in orbit, man has put himself in peril by pursuing his dream of conquering space.

The first manned space flight was a brief affair. Strapped into his 4¾-ton craft, Vostock 1, it took the young Soviet cosmonaut less than 90 minutes to make an orbit of the Earth before returning home.

Yuri Gagarin spawned a sometimes deadly legacy But in that short time, Gagarin spawned a great legacy of which the Columbia shuttle disaster is a part - manned spaceflight.

Down the years, that legacy has cost a significant handful of lives.

In January 1961, three American astronauts died on board the Apollo 1 spacecraft. Virgil Grissom, Roger Chaffe and Edmund White all perished in a fire during a simulated lift off at Cape Canaveral in Florida.

The accident was caused by a wiring short circuit in the craft's pure oxygen atmosphere - a flaw that forced a redesign of the Apollo craft and delayed its first manned mission.

SPACE TRAGEDIES

1967 (Jan) - three US astronauts die in simulated launch

1967 (Apr) - Soviet cosmonaut dies when parachute fails

1971 - three cosmonauts die during re-entry

1986 - space shuttle breaks up killing seven

Three months later, Soviet cosmonaut Victor Komaruv was killed when a parachute on his spaceship failed on re-entry and his craft plummeted to Earth.

Komaruv is one of only 11 people to die on a space mission. In 1971 three cosmonauts - Georgi Dobrovolsky, Vladislav Volkov and Victor Patsayev - died during re-entry.

The men had spent a record 24 days away from Earth but died because of an accidental depressurisation of their Soyuz spacecraft.

Before Saturday's Columbia disaster, the only other fatal accident had been the 1986 Challenger explosion, in which all seven crew were killed.

Near misses

Significantly more people have died in space related accidents, before craft have even left the ground.

In October 1960, 91 people were killed when a rocket exploded at a space centre in Kazakhstan in the USSR.

Twenty years later, 50 technicians died when a Vostock booster rocket exploded while being refuelled. A cover-up by the Soviet authorities meant the accident was only reported in 1989.

And there have been some near misses - one of the most recent being the 1997 collision between the aging Russian space station Mir, and a supply ship.

A recent report found the sheer amount of human activity in space was proving a danger in itself, because of the risk of collision with floating debris left by previous missions.

How dangerous is it?

There are an estimated 10,000 man-made objects larger that 10 cm (4 inches) in orbit and probably tens of millions of fragments less than 1 cm (0.4 inch).

Space travel is often cited as more dangerous than just about any other form of getting around.

But the true extent of the danger remains a hotly-debated topic.

While the space shuttle has failed only twice in its 113 launches, that is still high when translated into everyday terms.

As BBC News Online's science editor Dr David Whitehouse points out, if the same statistics were applied to everyday travel, anyone who drove their car to and from work once a day would be lucky to live to the end of the month.

Yet, comparing accidents to the number of hours spent in space gives a different picture.

Following the Mir collision in 1997, the New Scientist calculated that the number of deaths in space equated to 1 per 10,000 "flying hours".

"The figure for the US's aircraft industry last year was one death every 37,000 flying hours," said the magazine.

"Express this as deaths per passenger mile and flying in space turns out to be the safest form of travel on or off Earth."


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: accident; columbia; columbiatragedy; feb12003; nasa; shuttle; space; spaceshuttle
I think this article gives a good historical background and puts things in perspective.

While such accidents are tragic, and we mourn those who perished, but space exploration is still an amazing feat.

1 posted on 02/01/2003 11:56:53 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Could somebody repost that quote from 'Q' of 'Star Trek: The Next Generation' that I have seen on the forum, the one about it being 'dangerous out here' and 'exploration is not for the timid'?

I really liked that- it captured the spirit of those with 'The Right Stuff'.
2 posted on 02/02/2003 12:00:47 AM PST by Riley (I STILL think that DUers must all look like the Comic Book guy on the Simpsons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Riley
You mean this one?

"It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross... But it's not for the timid." -- Q
3 posted on 02/02/2003 12:15:21 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Not long after the Challenger explosion there was the usual cowardly din from the socialists that the US would be better off, and spend far less money on its space program, if it concentrated on unmanned rather than mannedspace exploration.

A very good editorial cartoonist at the time published a cartoon which depicted several horse-drawn Conestoga wagons with nobody in them. People were instead standing behind the wagons, which were ostensibly pointed westward, and the cartoon was captioned, "Fearful of the unknown, the early pioneers launched unmanned wagon trains to explore the American West." I wish I still had a copy of that cartoon because my description doesn't do it justice. But it was beautiful, and it really hit home. Space exploration is all about man reaching for the stars.

4 posted on 02/02/2003 12:21:49 AM PST by Lancey Howard (Where's Hank Scorpio when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Not meaning to be morbid but there were 2 more men who died at NASA in the 1970s (1974?) when they were electrocuted in an accident in the water tank (pool) used in training.

I could not find an account of this readily online and do not recall in these were "technicians" or astronauts in training but they also died in the service of the space program.

5 posted on 02/02/2003 12:37:56 AM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
That's part of it! He also admonished Picard to go back to his own planet and hide under his bed if he wasn't up to the task...
6 posted on 02/02/2003 7:32:09 AM PST by Riley (I STILL think that DUers must all look like the Comic Book guy on the Simpsons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
"Fearful of the unknown, the early pioneers launched unmanned wagon trains to explore the American West."

Space exploration is all about man reaching for the stars.

----

It was an excellent cartoon. I agree. Timidity can't be part of an explorer's vocabulary.
There are risks, there are sacrifices, we mourn them, but we must carry on undaunted, to succeed.
7 posted on 02/02/2003 1:39:50 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson