Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/01/2003 6:51:38 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: *calpowercrisis; randita; SierraWasp; Carry_Okie; okie01; socal_parrot; snopercod; quimby; ...
Calpowercrisis:
To find all articles tagged or indexed using Calpowercrisis, click below:
  click here >>> Calpowercrisis <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)



2 posted on 02/01/2003 6:52:15 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Impeach Davis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I switched my electric company here in Texas, and am saving about 25% on my bill each month. During the summer, that is big bucks.
3 posted on 02/01/2003 7:07:28 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Free market for power cuts cost, professors say 3-university manifesto urges California to stick with deregulation, including letting customers choose providers. "

idiot eggheads......

if you deregulate something that there is a shortage of...
the price will go up.

BUT...its a MOOT point;
its always REGULATED by the public utilities commission....
the damn government is still gonna screw it up....

4 posted on 02/01/2003 7:47:26 PM PST by hoot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
State regulators and lawmakers scaled back parts of the state's 1996 deregulation plan, including consumer choice of power retailers, after wholesale prices soared in 2000 and 2001

And what's significant about that time period?...

A) It happened during California's deregulation.


Jan. 4, 2003, 1:00AM

Long-distance rates do turnaround

Call prices up despite competition

By BRIAN BERGSTEIN
Associated Press

NEW YORK -- It seems to defy a basic law of business: Competition is increasing in the long-distance phone market, but prices are going up anyway.

How can this be? Companies and analysts say it's partly because prices for long-distance calls -- and many other telecommunications services -- simply got unsustainably low in recent years.

But it's also because of the nature of the competition itself.

Increasingly, long-distance calling is available as part of "bundled" packages that also include local phone service and high-speed Internet access. Customers who don't sign up for such packages, and instead take basic services a la carte, are less profitable for the leading long-distance players, AT&T, Sprint and WorldCom.

Those basic calling plans are the ones that have seen increases in recent weeks. AT&T and WorldCom's MCI division -- Nos. 1 and 2 in long distance, respectively -- have raised several monthly fees and per-minute rates, and indicated more increases are on the way. Sprint, the third largest long-distance player, is widely expected to follow suit.

With land line revenue plunging at AT&T and Sprint, and WorldCom in bankruptcy, it makes sense that the companies would try to extract more money from customers who make relatively few calls, or steer them into bundled services, which are likely to maintain more attractive prices, analysts said.

"To a certain extent, they realize they're going to lose many of their low-end customers, but they don't really mind because they're making most of their money from higher-paying customers," said F. Drake Johnstone, a telecom analyst for Davenport & Co.

Any increases in long-distance rates by AT&T, MCI and Sprint might seem to play right into the hands of their newest competitors: the nation's four huge regional phone companies, Qwest Communications International, SBC Communications, Verizon Communications and BellSouth. Those four have won regulatory approval to offer local and long-distance calling in 36 states, with more likely in 2003.

But those companies don't offer big discounts either, especially because they badly need long-distance revenue to counteract weakness in the local phone business.

The local market also has been invaded by none other than the big long-distance companies, although the regional phone giants hope federal regulators soon make that process more difficult.

"In the short term, the Bells could put some pressure on the big three to delay rate hikes, but they cannot afford to lower rates," said Rich Sayers, who runs consumer Web sites such as 10-10PhoneRates.com and Phone-Bill-Alert.com. "AT&T, MCI and Sprint have overhead that is far too high to compete on price."

AT&T spokesman Gary Morgenstern said long-distance prices fell to "irrational" levels in recent years partly because WorldCom used financial shenanigans to mask the impact its bargains had on its bottom line.

MCI spokeswoman Claire Hassett denied that WorldCom used its $9 billion accounting fraud to push long-distance prices to artificially low levels. She said competition kept prices down, but rising overhead has made that unsustainable.

There still are options for inexpensive long-distance calls, especially wireless phone plans that offer free nights and weekends.

And for people willing to take extra steps, some "dial-around" services and prepaid calling cards charge less than 5 cents a minute or have shorter billing increments. In comparison, MCI recently raised calls on some plans to 9 cents a minute.

Price competition works in both directions...Otherwise prices would never rise.
5 posted on 02/01/2003 8:05:58 PM PST by lewislynn (Vindicated once again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson