1 posted on
02/01/2003 3:27:16 PM PST by
blam
To: blam
bttt.......
To: blam
Very possible indeed that the figure is a representation of the constellation Orion.
Its constituent stars would have been in almost exactly the same arrangement as they are today.
That's a function of their relative distance (all are several hundred light-years away). Constellations with nearby stars have changed their patterns, sometimes quite noticeably, over millennia.
BTW, Orion is the most recognizable constellation. See it any (clear of course) night from mid-August (just before morning twilight in the east) to mid April (just after evening twilight in the west) at mid-northern latitudes.
4 posted on
02/01/2003 4:45:59 PM PST by
petuniasevan
(Learn more at my APOD threads! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/t-apod/browse)
To: blam
"Rappenglück's hypothesis, based on serious speculation and in agreement with his ample knowledge of the art and symbolism of those periods, might be probable and even possible."
. . .sounds more than reasonable to me. . .
. . .hmmm 32,000 years old. Time. . .it's all perspective and 'space'.
5 posted on
02/01/2003 5:02:27 PM PST by
cricket
To: Pharmboy; blam; Ernest_at_the_Beach; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother
10 posted on
02/05/2006 8:00:56 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Islam is medieval fascism, and the Koran is a medieval Mein Kampf.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson