Replies

Get your ass out of reverse gear. Why the hell you are going back up thread to ~~answer~~ address questions that you should have ~~answered~~ addressed then is beyond me.

I played yor game and clarified the question extremely well. Now you are hiding and obfuscating.

"Why would you not support a law Congress passes if the courts have not overruled it or has stayed silent on it?"

This proposal hasn't been passed, might not ever be passed, hasn't been signed into law, might not ever be signed into law, isn't in it's final form, has never been applied, has never been appealed, has never been before any court and has never had a decision issued regarding it constitutionality.

Your answer isn't for that question. If you hadn't been so busy being such a jerk yesterday and actually answered the questions as they were asked you wouldn't look as stupid now as you do.

Your answer is to whether or not you would support the law propesed in the posted article.

Of course it hasn't been signed, ruled on etc. God bless America, how freaking dense can one person be?

Would you support this law? If not, why not. If so, why so?