Disgraceful that our party can't get its act together here and elect a speaker !
To: jern; ForOurFuture; Constitution Day; William Creel; *Old_North_State; **North_Carolina; ...
*ping*
2 posted on
01/29/2003 12:53:26 PM PST by
fieldmarshaldj
(~All our ZOT's are belong to us~)
To: fieldmarshaldj
Hilarious that a state house of representatives has an even number of members, even more hilarious is that there are 60 Democrats and 60 Republicans, and no end in sight.
Unless a member of either party betrays his side there may never be a speaker in NC.
To: fieldmarshaldj
ah, I see that a Republican has already defected, turning a 121-119 majority into a 120-120 gridlock.
First, there should never be an even number of members, because it leads to situations like this. There has to be a tiebreaker. If anyone in NC knows, what exactly is the tiebreaker?
Second, the people elected a Republican 2 seat majority, so the choice of the Republicans (hopefully all 60) should be speaker. Problem is likely that Dems are willing to steal the speakership Jeffords-style regardless of legitimacy.
To: fieldmarshaldj; JohnnyZ
I think "Double Agent" Decker switched to the Black Side because he was worried about redistricting. If the NC House stayed in GOP hands, the whole redistricting issue would probably be then decided by the courts. When judges draw the political landscape who knows what will happen. We all know politicans hate campaigning in unfamiliar territory. "Double Agent" Decker figured if he sided with the Black Side, the 'RATS, then being in complete control of redistricting, will draw a friendly district for him.
Now that it appears to be a stalemate in the NC House, I think the best solution would be to have Co-House Speakers. This will enable the GOP to have some say in the redistricting process. Most likely with a power sharing arrangement, a redistricting impasse will occur. This scenario might benefit the NC GOP. With a redistricting impasse, the GOP majority NC Supreme Court will be forced to draw the NC political landscape. This won't guarantee favorable lines for the GOP, but it is better than what Easley and Black have in mind.
18 posted on
01/29/2003 4:11:04 PM PST by
Kuksool
(Down With Easley & Edwards in '04!)
To: fieldmarshaldj
Decker's defection ripped wider... should read Decker's defecation...
19 posted on
01/29/2003 5:55:59 PM PST by
Xthe17th
(FREE THE STATES. Repudiate the 17th amendment!)
To: fieldmarshaldj
Disgraceful that our party can't get its act together here and elect a speaker ! If they can't have a speaker they can't get anything done. IF they can't get anything done, then no new taxes or stupid laws get passed ......
Where exactly is the down side to this again ??
23 posted on
01/29/2003 6:08:39 PM PST by
Centurion2000
(The meek shall inherit the Earth. The stars belong to the bold.)
To: fieldmarshaldj
Even it came as a surprise when one Democrat, Rep. Mary McAllister of Fayetteville, accidently voted with Republicans to adjourn when she meant to vote against adjournment. She must have move here from Flori-duh.
25 posted on
01/29/2003 6:29:41 PM PST by
El Whino
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson