Replies

Well, what I've noticed about any thread about either of the Clintons on this site is that it quickly attracts a group of people whose attitudes and words IMNSHO justify changing the law back from providing an ex-President Secret Service protection for 10 years to the previous practice of providing it for him or her for life. I don't see a lot of rationality, and it makes it hard to credit anything they come up with without taking extensive measures of my own to check up on it, and I'm really not so concerned that I care to take the time.

Again: having said that, if the man is guilty of rape, etc., then let his accusers come forward with evidence and get him tried. If he's then convicted, lock him up and well done. If there is an official coverup at the county or state level, then let evidence of that be put forward at the state or federal level. Otherwise, I can't treat it as any more than rumor.

I only use the terms "Urban Legend" when I find something debunked on a couple or more of the various websites dedicated to the same. Which is not to say that they are always correct, but their record so far seems quite good.

"their record so far seems quite good"

Not with regards to the Clintons...I've used the websites you reference, too, but I've noticed that they go outta their way to deny most--if not all--of Clinton's Crimes, despite boucoups evidence that they are WRONG!!

MUD

Hmmm...I guess you are unaware that the Clintons have had a way of compromising any legal action against them. Just because some people have tried to charge them with high crimes and misdemeanors and have sadly failed doesn't mean they are as pure as the proverbial wind-driven snow.

Please see my profile page. Scroll down on the right. List of Clinton Crimes. Enjoy.