Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SCalGal
Exactly. A true rebuttal would have summarized AP line items in a few sentences.

I think this rebuttal indicates FR has opened up a mile wide scandal.

Someone should email this to O'Reilly. I will volunteer. I'll send the whole thread as an attachment.

Will get back to the board with any response.
11 posted on 01/28/2003 9:00:59 PM PST by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Hostage
Send it, please! I'd like to know if that money is really up for grabs.

Also, butthead here (the author in this obviously commie little Oregon propoganda rag), fails to mention, knowing full well that most of his audience won't research the actual article, that in the cafr piece it is made clear that the law restricts the use of some of this money. But it also puts in "easy to understand words" that the laws are changeable.
14 posted on 01/28/2003 9:30:27 PM PST by EBUCK (....reloading....praparing to FIRE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Hostage
O'Reilly never opens attachments, he's said so on-air.
62 posted on 01/30/2003 4:26:46 PM PST by visualops
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson