Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/28/2003 5:05:12 PM PST by PierreEsbaillart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: PierreEsbaillart
Hey, Pierre,

Bite my arrogant American ass. France is a third-world, has-been country that has NEVER willingly cooperated with the U.S. in any military conflict. Arrogance? Thy name is France. Stupidity? They name is Chirac. Idiot? Thy name is Pierre.

Where the hell do you get off trying to lecture any goddamn American? Go to Normandy and hit your knees, a$$hole. You're only free to spread your filth because Americans gave their lives to save sorry and ungrateful French asses.

And a$$holes like you do your country no good. All you do is give evidence to those who might doubt French cowardice. For that...I thank you.

108 posted on 01/28/2003 7:56:30 PM PST by geedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
The Ballad of the Ladies of Yore

François Villon

Where, pray tell me, in which land,
where is Flora the fair Roman?
and Archipiades and Thaïs,
all cousins in art and voice?
Echo, she spoke where we bellowed
across rivers, over ponds,
held more beauty than human should.
But whither have gone the snows of yore?

Where is that most wise Heloïs
for whom was gelded then monk became
Pierre Esbaillart
at Saint-Dennis?

Is that your problem Pierre? Were you gelded?

Pierre Esbaillart

114 posted on 01/28/2003 8:14:19 PM PST by F-117A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
Now for something entirely different. Perhpas some freepers should stop to consider how it is that Bush II is having such a tough time getting a real coalition together to attack Iraq when his father didn't seem to have half the problems? Is it the simple minded notion presented here, ad nauseum, that Europeons are just cowardly weenies, "traitors", "backstabbers", and ungrateful? Or could it actually be that attacking Iraq when it hasn't actually attacked anyone else is a leap they don't want to take? Perhaps it is not in their interest to do so. By treaty they are certainly not obligated to attack Iraq (even for violating UN resolutions.) Perhaps the Europeons had enough of unprovoked wars when Clinton bombed Kosovo for 78 days and Europe was racked with protests and NATO nearly faultered?

What is the difference between Gulf War I and the enthusiastic participation of Europe to today's circumstances?

115 posted on 01/28/2003 8:17:29 PM PST by Burkeman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
"Israel in Palestine, etc"

Well well well, I guess you can barely contain your hatred of the Jews, you little Vichy fascist Froggie. Let's see here, if Israel has existed for 4000 years and something called "Palestine" NEVER existed, how dare you speak of "Israel in Palestine"? Unless to show your contempt for Israel and your support for the sundry vermin who wish to destroy Israel. But what a silly question to put to you, considering the fact that 60 years ago you Froggies were shipping Jews off to Dachau. And Pierre, did you hear about the boycott of Froggie goods here in the States - it's just getting started and spreading like crazy. No big deal for you, right, because you can always rely on your new friends the Germans to help you make it through.

117 posted on 01/28/2003 8:21:39 PM PST by Bedford Forrest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
PierreEsbaillart signed up 2003-01-28.

Femme la bousch, Pierre. When we want your cheese eating surrender monkey opinion we will beat it out of you.

120 posted on 01/28/2003 8:30:04 PM PST by WhirlwindAttack (I love the smell of burnt dim o craps in the morning. It smells like victory. ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
"iraq has not yet attack anyone". Is this idiot less than 12 years old? More than a decade ago, not only did iraq attack Iran, but also Kuwait, and the Kurds. This rant is pure french BS. Everything said in FR about the frogs are right on target.
121 posted on 01/28/2003 8:30:21 PM PST by desertcry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
This a-hole doesn't have a clue. That's why he and most french suck.
122 posted on 01/28/2003 8:31:30 PM PST by Pushi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
The United States should attack Paris first. What are the French going to do? Fight back?
131 posted on 01/28/2003 8:52:50 PM PST by Dec31,1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart; dighton; BlueLancer
So tell me, Pierre---were you referred to this site by a college student from Germany, by any chance?

And when can we expect your friends?

;-x
137 posted on 01/28/2003 9:38:24 PM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
And the rest of the world fears you but it doesn't love you..."'tis better that the Prince be feared than loved" - Machiavelli (and lest you think this is just bitter and outmoded rhetoric from some cynical opportunist who left the earth five hundred years ago, read Michael Ledeen's Machiavelli on Modern Leadership:Why Machiavelli's Iron Rules Are as Timely and Important Today as Five Centuries Ago - maybe you'll understand mieux les americains)...
138 posted on 01/28/2003 9:41:16 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
Illogic is your forte.
139 posted on 01/28/2003 9:41:59 PM PST by dennisw (http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/weblog.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
Axis of weasel bump.
142 posted on 01/28/2003 9:48:18 PM PST by OneLoyalAmerican ( Pedophile wannabe traitor Ritter data thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/829655/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
Who wrote this and who translated it?

I see you're new to Free Republic. Welcome.

The article says that Iraq has not attacked the U.S. We BELIEVE it has. We believe Iraq is complicit as "shadow accomplices" of Al Queda. There is convincing circumstantial evidence....lots of it.

Hans Blix proved yesterday that Iraq continues to violate it's pledge to destroy its weapons of mass destruction.

We will not be caught sleeping again. We will take down the government of Iraq. We will do it alone. They are our deadly enemies.
143 posted on 01/28/2003 9:48:54 PM PST by xzins (Prepare Ye the way of the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
Irak has not yet attacked anyone.

Yes they did, they invaded Kuwait, and have failed to demonstrate a change in their ways. Their next attack should be prevented, not encouraged by the french "peace through surrender" method.

Anyway, the French will get theirs, they have embraced islamofascism with open arms, and before they know it they will be cowering under their new boss like they did under hitler. This time we shouldn't bother to liberate them.

California wine is better, anyway, as is Wisconsin cheese...

144 posted on 01/28/2003 9:53:29 PM PST by EaglesUpForever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
French culture
The French have no culture, just A couple of guys that can draw.
Joe Soucheray
145 posted on 01/28/2003 10:02:44 PM PST by Valin (Place your ad here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
Are they kidding??? THEY are being US. The pot would call the kettle black, if he ever stops laughing.
146 posted on 01/28/2003 10:04:23 PM PST by Blackyce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
NATO should have nothing to do with "preventive wars".

KOSOVO

French people are not the stupid blind nationalists that your propaganda is pretending they are.

100,000 Albanians buried in mass graves.

I've been trying to get this sentiment worked into a discussion. There is no near term solution at this point. USA under Clintons screwed up bigtime, they are criminals and the rest of the world knows it. As a nation, we let them walk.

Can't prosecute them now. Would divert attention away from WOT and damage existing relations further. This is by no means W's fault. The only way out is to let G.W.B's integrity work into their mindset. But that may not work. We lost their trust. God what a mess the Clinton's made!

Best to forget about it, unless someone has a better idea.

147 posted on 01/28/2003 10:12:54 PM PST by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
Once a collaborator, always a collaborator...
153 posted on 01/28/2003 10:57:34 PM PST by SeenTheLight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
Hey, Pierre.... Welcome to Free Republic!


156 posted on 01/28/2003 11:08:19 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PierreEsbaillart
Greetings PierreEsbaillart, FReepers, et al:

Welcome to FR. Lurk a while and ask questions, you may surprised what you will learn. Hopefully the French will come their senses soon; before her capitol becomes Parisistan.
La bienvenue à l'ARMATURE menacent un moment et posent des questions, vous peut a étonné ce que vous apprendrez. Si tout va bien le Français viendra leurs sens bientôt; avant son capitol devient Parisistan.

If Iraq enjoyed a free press, free speech, and freedom of association, and the USA threatened her; there could be a moral unjust war argument. But that is not the case with Iraq. There is no frame of reference, by western standards of civilization, for comparing Iraq. For the controlled Iraqi press, even a Holy Bible requires an image of Saddam Hussein. You did know that. Right?
De si l'Irak appréciait une pression libre, un discours libre, et une liberté association, et les Etats-Unis l'ont menacée; il a pu y a un argument injuste moral de guerre. Mais ce n'est pas le cas avec l'Irak. Il n'y a aucune armature de la référence, par des normes occidentales de civilisation, pour comparer l'Irak. Pour la pression irakienne commandée, même une bible sainte exige une image de Saddam Hussein. Vous avez su cela. Droite?

An ostrich like stance on Iraq will not make Saddam go away, or behave. Sanctions were violated, inspections thwarted, while a new paradigm of warfare emerged: state sponsored terrorism. We're not talking about a cowardly attack upon an unarmed peace protester's ship here. You do understand that an Embassy is an extension of home soil?
Une autruche comme la position sur l'Irak ne fera pas Saddam partir, ou comportez-vous. Des sanctions ont été violées, des inspections contrecarrées, alors qu'un nouveau paradigme de la guerre émergeait: l'état a commandité le terrorisme. Nous ne parlons pas d'une attaque lâche sur le bateau d'un protestataire unarmed de paix ici. Vous comprenez qu'une ambassade est une prolongation du sol à la maison?

Laurie Mylroie, President Clinton's advisor on Iraq, in her book Study of Revenge: The First World Trade Center Attack and Saddam Hussein’s War Against America, leaves little doubt the first WTC attack and US Embassy bombings were Iraqi state sponsored terrorist acts. Mylroie also makes a good case the 9/11 attack was too. Iraq trains terrorist, harbors terrorists, and funds terrorist acts too. With that in mind, a war against state sponsored terrorism is an unjust war?
Laurie Mylroie, conseiller du Président Clinton's sur l'Irak, dans sa étude de livre de vengeance: La premières attaque de centre commercial mondial et guerre de Saddam Hussein?s contre l'Amérique, laisse peu à doute la première attaque de WTC et les bombardements d'ambassade des USA étaient des actes de terroriste commandités par état irakien. Mylroie fait également un bon cas que l'attaque de 9/11 était aussi. L'Irak forme le terroriste, terroristes de ports, et place des actes de terroriste aussi. Avec cela à l'esprit, une guerre contre le terrorisme commandité par état est une guerre injuste?

The horrific cruelty of Saddam is beyond belief. Former UNSCOM inspector, and now peace activist Scott Ritter, described an Iraqi children’s political prison. Ritter asserts in a Time Magazine story if we knew what went on in that children’s prison, even the peaceniks would demand war with Iraq. Freeing the Iraqi children from this brutal repression is somehow unjust?
La cruauté terrifiante de Saddam est au delà de croyance. L'ancien inspecteur d'UNSCOM, et maintenant l'activiste Scott Ritter de paix, ont décrit une prison politique de children?s irakiens. Ritter affirme dans une histoire de magazine de temps si nous savions ce qui a continué du fait la prison de children?s, même les peaceniks exigerait la guerre avec l'Irak. Libérer les enfants irakiens de cette répression brutale est de façon ou d'autre injuste?

This Gulf War Veteran disagrees with the foolish imbeciles of France. Either France is with us, or she is against us. There is little doubt why my ancestors left the "axis of weasel" for the New World.
Ce vétéran de la guerre du Golfe est en désaccord avec les imbeciles idiots de la France. Ou la France est avec nous, ou elle est contre nous. Il y a peu doute pourquoi mes ancêtres ont laissé l'"axe du weasel" pour le nouveau monde.

The Iraqi people have suffered long enough. It is time to liberate the Iraqi people.
Les irakiens ont souffert assez longtemps. Il est temps de libérer les irakiens.


157 posted on 01/28/2003 11:08:53 PM PST by OneLoyalAmerican ( Pedophile wannabe traitor Ritter data thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/829655/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson