Replies

On the other hand, if my activities DO present a danger to others, particularly at work, then the government/my employer DOES have a business knowing about it.

So, under your line of reasoning due to the myriad of assaults in the workplace involving firearms, its okay for your employer/government to inquire whether or not you own firearms and then deny you employment based on your answer. Let's not leave out periodic checks of your car and residence for those firearms.

If you are smoking dope/shooting-up/snorting junk/etc. and you get behind the wheel of a big rig, school bus, or just plain automibile, you have endangered me and anyone else that is around. You have just violated my freedom. Remeber, your rights end where mine begin

When you support urine tests, no-knock raids, property confiscation before a guilty verdict, and tax money thrown away on the WOsD, you violate more than just drug users' rights, you violate everyone's rights. The thought of my lawn guy being high three weeks ago scares me a whole lot less than the abuse that could be visited on me by one of the "alphabet agencies".

My statement "what do you have to hide" was in reaction to what I see all the time as a school teacher. Those students most inflamed when the drug dogs come for a visit, complaining about privacy/etc. are 99% of the time the exact same ones who have drugs or other contriband on them/in their lockers/in their cars. Certainly this is a generalization, but it comes about as close to the truth as any I have ever heard

There are no junior high students on this forum. The majority here have been voting, tax-paying adults for over a decade. Many here like myself have also served in the US Armed Forces. It's a little insulting to be generalized with a pre-teen demographic. :)

I may not agree with you, but it's nice to find that there's an educator left with some good old classic Republican values......even if they are wrong. ;)

Sandflea

Exactly how does the ownership of firearms translate directly to danger to the workplace? Mental incompetence on the part of those committing the crimes maybe, and in some cases drug use. The ownership of firearms in-and-of itself does not directly connect to workplace assaunts.

Drug tests for those who, DIRECTLY through drug use, are likely to be a danger, yes.

No-nock raids are an extremely dangerous and questionable tactice used by law enforcement. I have a very hard time with the use of no-nock raids unless there is CLEAR and compelling evidence that it is the only method to control a situation. I think "no-nock" raids should require a specific instruction set forth in the search warrant. That way, there is more accountability when it is used. Again, this would go back to the idea of a "clear and present" danger.

I in NO WAY support property confiscation before a guilty verdict and never have. Nothing I have said should have led you to any other conclusion.

Does a drunk spell or light-up of some pot last week by your yard man cause a clear danger to you, your family, or community?

The War on Drugs has taken on a far too political tone. I have yet to see any evidence whatsoever that drug use is harmless, or that we would be better off if drugs were legalized. I HAVE seen the dangers of drug use. I have seen people die because someone used drugs/alcohol and killed others. A DIRECT correlation. There is no such thing as "responsible" drug use. Drugs are a scourge on society, not even including the senseless deaths from drug lords/gangs, or the senseless deaths when the WOD has gone sour.

I had not intent to include you in a "pre-teen" generalization. I am going on my own experience. Honestly, many (notice I didn't say all) that do get up-in-arms when it comes to privacy are indeed engaged in activities that they bear some guilt about - even when it's legal activity. I am certain, to be quite honest, that I would be extremely upset if the police burst into my home to search my house on suspicion of anything - I am not and have not been engaged in any illegal actvities (that I know of ;-) I honestly can't think of anything I have to hide (other than the underwear I probably should have thrown away months ago because they are so worn out). Yet I would be incredibly upset - and justified. What evidence/probable cause would they have for their invasion.

On the other hand, if I were cooking meth in my realoading room, and the police had direct evidence of such, then I would have no grounds at all for a complaint if they search my home. I would probably still be mad, but would have no "grounds" to complain.

My "good old classic Republican values" have come at a price - I spent many years blind to the truth about politics and regret every minute I spent supporting DeomocRATS. Of course, I can thank my Mom for that - she is a bleading-heart to please bleading-hearts.