[Dead Corpse]

Don't bet on it. I still haven't gotten an answer from the gun grabber Roscoe. He asserts that the Constitution, and therefore the Secdon Amendment, only applies to the FedGov. If that is so, then under what authority was this Federal Employee acting under on Federal Lands? If there was no Constitutional authority for her to do what she did, then would it not be considered an armed robbery?

I'm not holding my breath waiting for one of his circular logic, one-liner answers.

[tpaine]

Good points 'rabid'. -- I'll flag up some more of your big talking, play-acting friends.
Perhaps they will get the picture now that you are starting to see reason.
331 tpaine


Don't bet on it. I still haven't gotten an answer from the gun grabber Roscoe.
He asserts that the Constitution, and therefore the Second Amendment, only applies to the FedGov.
If that is so, then under what authority was this Federal Employee acting under on Federal Lands? If there was no Constitutional authority for her to do what she did, then would it not be considered an armed robbery?
I'm not holding my breath waiting for one of his circular logic, one-liner answers.
332

Exactly right. And roscoe is not alone at FR in his gun-grabbing sympathies, incredibly enough.

This site has become infested with Rinos that claim that ALL levels of government, state/fed/local, can rule by majority will, by decree, ignoring our inalienable rights life, liberty, and property.

Yet they somehow claim they support a free republic. -- Go figure.