Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
Billy's insurance company tells him that it doesn't cover accidents if he doesn't wear a seatbelt. Then:

A. Billy chooses to pay a higher premium to his insurance company to be assigned to a higher risk insurance pool with other people who choose to not wear seatbelts. City's truck hits Billy, Billy is covered. Nobody's insurance rates go up except those in the high risk insurance pool, who chose to share additional risk.

B. Billy chooses to not pay the higher premium. Then, in violation of his insurance contract, Billy chooses to not wear his seatbelt. City's truck hits Billy. Billy can't pay his bills and is SOL. Bleeding heart liberals socialists are beside themselves with remorse at poor (and stupid) Billy's predicament, but can't bring themselves to donate their own money for his hospital stay. And one of them says, "Why, thereottabealaw..." The rest is history.

61 posted on 01/27/2003 1:38:13 PM PST by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: freeeee
That's what the military instituted for it's members back in the early 80's. If you, or a dependant, was injured or killed in an auto accident and you were not wearing a seatbelt, then you forfeit all expenses that would normally be paid by the military.

Needless to say, my Father was beyond any measure of strictness when it came to our family wearing seatbelts. That "loss of liberty" hasn't harmed me at all, and saved the military millions and millions of taxpayer dollars.

63 posted on 01/27/2003 1:42:48 PM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson