Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bvw
**A marrriage, that sacred contract between a man and a woman, is the better thing we should protect -- and that Ritter risked, and any man's or woman's risking puts all marriages at risk for lessening the singular regard marriages must be held in.**

Disclaimer: We hereby exonerate, and hold harmless, William Scott Ritter, and/or any man or woman, from any and all responsibility for putting our particular marriage under risk and distress by any adulterous, scandalous, or illegal activity he or she may have entered into, unbeknownst to, and not directly effecting, Mr and Mrs. auboy.

Witnessed this 27th day of January, 2003 AD
72 posted on 01/27/2003 6:35:24 PM PST by auboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: auboy
Okay, a fair enough line. If you hold that laws are made to better align ourselves with God, you might then see God as a party to the contract of marriage, and not be so cavalier about dispossessing what it might then be your duty to uphold.
81 posted on 01/27/2003 7:05:53 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson