[bvw]

Rape? Look, if it is an actual 13 year old, exhibitionary display is a crime, but not rape. And in a number of states, girls (with parental consent) can MARRY at 14. So actual full "sex" is legal with a 14 year old girl, even if the man is 44, 93, whatever.

In any case there was NO actual minor involved in the Ritter "affair" as reported so far. It was a sting, a team of adult cops playacted the part of a girl.

[habs4ever]

You are a pettifogger extraordinaire.His first encounter was with a 14 yr old, in April 2001.His second, in June 2001, was with the 16 yr old, who was a cop.He is a seeker of sexual thrills with teenage girls.He could like to do even more things, but alas, got caught.And a good thing too.

He sought to engage in these things knowing it was against the law.It matters not a whit if it was a sting.There was no entrapement, he sought out the chat rooms, he organized the rendezvous, he was loaded for bear.Do you hate cops so much that you wish to blame them for doing their job and keeping a predator from indulging his darkest fantasies?

Yaknow, a guy that gets stung was dipping into forbidden nectar.It is both illegal and WRONG.Do try to spin that, cookie.