To: Happy2BMe
That's not what we're going to do at all. The goal is to surgically eliminate Iraq's capability to defend itself. Killing the entire population of Baghdad by eliminating their water supply is not necessary.
It would be stupid and counterproductive.
6 posted on
01/26/2003 8:30:28 AM PST by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
But by the same token, killing the entire population of Baghdad WOULD limit Baghdad's ability to defend itself... (Not that I advocate that or anything...)
8 posted on
01/26/2003 8:35:52 AM PST by
Chad Fairbanks
(We've got Armadillos in our trousers. It's really quite frightening.)
To: Dog Gone
It would be stupid and counterproductive.It would also be against the rules of war. A deliberate attack on the civilian population.
But, if we were to destroy it incidentally to attacking a military target, well ... so be it. The only problem I see is that we would, eventually, end up paying to rebuild it, either in money or other considerations. IMO.
25 posted on
01/26/2003 9:15:29 AM PST by
templar
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson