So,I guess this means you think the UN should go to war agains the US because we refuse to obey the internation Kyoto treaty,as well as the small arms prohibition?
and keep on terrorizing his own people and the world.
While he is terrorizing his own people,that is really none of our business. Or do you think we should go to war against China as soon as we finish off Iraq bedause they use slave labor to make the products for sale at Wal-Mart? If anything,we should be encouraging the people of Iraq to raise up and overthrow him,but this doesn't mean we should do it for them. Freedom handed to you isn't as prescious as freedom earned.
Go figure.
Good advise. You should try it.
You just compound idiocy after idiocy. Kyoto is a treaty we *havent signed* so it doesnt have any force of international law, now, does it? ... this is unlike the ceasefire agreement of the post-GulfWar where Iraq *did* sign up to end their programs producing weapons of mass destruction. Iraq has repeatedly failed to comply with their own promises made in that ceasefire agreement, repeatedly lied to inspectors and stymied the inspections programs, and continues to threaten us and others with its WMD programs and illegal activities.
While he is terrorizing his own people,that is really none of our business. Oh really, US airman flying over Iraq proecting the "nofly" zones are under different orders. I guess we can just end our "no-fly zones" then and let saddam get back to slaughtering his people. .... would that please you?
We may have to go to war with China someday.
Any other points ?
On the one hand Bush cites the failure of Iraq to live up to UN resolutions as a justification for a US attack.
On the other Bush tells the UN that if it does not agree with him, the UN is "irrelevant".
A shining example of hipocrasy.
Regards
J.R.