Skip to comments.
Rendell to replace D.C. office with lobbyists
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ^
| Thursday, January 23, 2003
| The Associated Press
Posted on 01/23/2003 11:47:55 AM PST by Willie Green
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:34:57 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
HARRISBURG -- Gov. Ed Rendell will close Pennsylvania's official office in Washington at the end of the month and replace it with two lobbyists working on the state's behalf, a person close to the situation said.
Rendell plans to replace six full-time positions at the Hall of States, located at the base of Capitol Hill, with lobbyists Peter A. Peyser Jr. and former Democratic Rep. Bob Borski, said the person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
(Excerpt) Read more at post-gazette.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: congress; lobbyists; representation
I guess 2 Senators and 19 congress-critters aren't enough representation.
The sad thing is, Pennsylvania isn't the only state wasting money on this crapola.
To: All
2
posted on
01/23/2003 11:50:54 AM PST
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Willie Green
When the country was founded, 'two lobbyists working on behalf of the state' were called senators -- appointed by the state legislatures. In the ensuing years certain people have eroded this safeguard down to a popularity/money contest.
3
posted on
01/23/2003 12:04:43 PM PST
by
lainie
To: lainie
Whether elected or appointed, they're still supposed to represent the interests of their state.
4
posted on
01/23/2003 12:07:14 PM PST
by
Willie Green
(Go Pat Go!!!)
To: Willie Green
Yeah.. in theory. The fact is modern senators are beholden to the people that elected them. The founders had given 'the people' their elected representatives (congressmen) and the state legislature (also elected by the people) were to send senators. Now what we have are congressmen with two-year terms and congressmen with six-year terms. Basically.
5
posted on
01/23/2003 12:25:46 PM PST
by
lainie
To: Willie Green
I don't understand why the terms of this contract are "unclear," though. Isn't it public money/public contract?
6
posted on
01/23/2003 12:29:42 PM PST
by
lainie
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson