Skip to comments.
TWA Flight 800 –an FBI cover-up? (CLINTON COVER-UP)
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| 1-23-03
| WorldNetDaily.com
Posted on 01/23/2003 10:54:43 AM PST by cody32127
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
1
posted on
01/23/2003 10:54:44 AM PST
by
cody32127
To: *TWA800_list
2
posted on
01/23/2003 10:56:23 AM PST
by
Free the USA
(Stooge for the Rich)
To: Free the USA
And Bush continues the cover-up.
To: Lexington Green
So Bush is in on the conspiracy? BWAHAHAHA
To: All
Look into my eyes! You Vill not Succeed !
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
5
posted on
01/23/2003 11:01:16 AM PST
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: cody32127
Sorry, but I remain skeptical. While the Clintons and their goons would be ready and willing to cover up something of this magnitude in a heartbeat, I have a problem believing that the government could keep the secret.
Somebody somewhere would tell. Or maybe they have and I've not heard of it.
To: cody32127
Sorry, but I remain skeptical. While the Clintons and their goons would be ready and willing to cover up something of this magnitude in a heartbeat, I have a problem believing that the government could keep the secret.
Somebody somewhere would tell. Or maybe they have and I've not heard of it.
To: Lexington Green
And Bush continues the cover-up.Hey stupid! Clinton killed the investigation in 96, Oh thats right Clinton gave Bush this info along with an attack plan for Osama bin Ladin and Bush didn't act Right?
You are just a fool!
8
posted on
01/23/2003 11:06:11 AM PST
by
cody32127
To: cody32127
If there was a cover-up, then Bush is continuing it. Was there a cover-up?
To: JeeperFreeper
People tried to talk, they went to jail.
To: Lexington Green
Oh yeah... you have stooped to juvenile name calling.... those names might hurt my feelings... and it's illegal in PC America to hurt my feelings.
To: Lexington Green
It may be difficult to uncover what has been covered, if done well. Witness the difficulty Jayna Davis has encountered merely getting a Congresscritter to read her investigation re:OKC bombing. And are there or aren't there videos showing a "...Middle-Eastern man exiting the Ryder truck with McVeigh?" Larry Johnson posited in the affirmative. Others deny.
See the problem? If Klintler covered-up OKC, then he surely would be capable of covering up an aircraft shoot-down....
12
posted on
01/23/2003 11:30:46 AM PST
by
donozark
To: cody32127
But some of these same people have insisted that there was a "massive" Naval Exercise ... and a test of a missile system and "Battle Management Software" . .. and the TWA flight 800 was brought down by a Navy Missile.
So what is it? A massive conspiracy to cover up a Navy accident .... or a massive conspiracy to cover up a terrorist strike .... or a massive conspiracy to .....? [Can't you see it ... or have they gotten to you also!!)
Mike
13
posted on
01/23/2003 11:33:47 AM PST
by
Vineyard
To: Asmodeus
You've got some more non-believers here.
14
posted on
01/23/2003 11:46:43 AM PST
by
Tymesup
To: cody32127
I have been skeptical when it comes to this case, and I still am.
But every friend or family member I have who was in the Navy at the time believes the Navy accidentally shot down the plane.
I report, you decide.
To: sharktrager
But every friend or family member I have who was in the Navy at the time believes the Navy accidentally shot down the plane. I am skeptical too.
As far as the Navy accidentally shooting the plane down I feel a lot of people would be in the know and it would have leaked out by now.
The terrorist theory seems more likely to me. - Tom
To: cody32127
I was on Westhampton Beach that day and saw TWA800 explode. I doubt that a missle hit the plane. I certainly didn't see any upward plume characteristic with the solid rocket fuels usually used in SAMS. Further, the plane was some distance from the shore and fairly high up, likely putting it out of range of most SAMS. If it was hit by a missle it could have only come from the air and most AAMS also use solid fuels that leave a plume -- there was none visible from the coast.
I do believe that the FBI messed things up because they were determined that this was going to be a criminal/terrorism investigation rather then an aircraft failure and just couldn't go about proving it. When the missle idea first hit the news you could see the FBI guys literally wetting their pants on TV. I'm sure it was a big disappointment to them that it wasn't.
17
posted on
01/23/2003 3:40:54 PM PST
by
gaucho
To: JeeperFreeper
Excuse me ...
the murder of JFK
the murder of Vince Foster
the murder of Ron Brown
I'm telling you SOMEBODY knows the truth - but so far, it's not reached the public.
18
posted on
01/23/2003 3:57:17 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(Syracuse where are you?)
To: sharktrager
The problem I have with that report is that x42 hated the military, and I keep thinking he would have gloried in the opportunity to embarass them; cut their funding; ridicule them before the world.
19
posted on
01/23/2003 4:03:51 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(Syracuse where are you?)
To: gaucho
Hmmmm? Your report of no plume does not match with 80% of the people WHO DID SEE ONE!
20
posted on
01/23/2003 4:05:55 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(Syracuse where are you?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson