[MurryMom]

Iraq's declaration even resorted to unabashed plagiarism, with lengthy passages of United Nations reports copied word-for-word (or edited to remove any criticism of Iraq) and presented as original text.

LOL! Little Dumbya and other goofy members of his administration never fail to generate lots of material for the Saturday Night Live and Politically Incorrect shows!

So when has copyright infringement become grounds for launching a missile strike? I bet Condi Rice never launched any missiles on the underclass dorms at Stanford when she discovered that some of her pupils copied papers from their classmates or from public sources.

[finnman69]

Obviously her eloquently drafted editorial might have been a bit advanced for you. Her point is they have offered nothing new.

Why do you even bother to post here since FR is out of your league?

[pgyanke]

> "So when has copyright infringement become grounds for launching a missile strike?"

Go back to DU... you're out of your league.

[paul51]

I think you may be in the wrong place

[Uncle Meat]

LOL! Little Dumbya and other goofy members of his administration never fail to generate lots of material for the Saturday Night Live and Politically Incorrect shows!

If you think they're so "goofy",what the hell do you call the last bunch of incompetent morons that were running things.That tells a lot about your mental state.Of course ,you've proven that you're so dense,and nobody here seems to be able to slap any sense in you,and we might as well talk to a compost pile.

[Kramer_AL]

Those pupils' copied papers weren't supposed to prove to the world that the authors weren't harboring WMD to use for God knows what.

[section9]

MurryMom, you ignorant skank.

Now, normally I'd get simply amused by your flatulent postings, your craving for the Barbara Streisand Land of Make Believe that Might Have Been.

But no, you had to come on a Condi Rice thread a lay a steaming pile. You're worse than Tuco. At least Tuco lays an egg like a good troll and tries to amplify the offense by using the same line, in which everyone is in on the joke.

You actually believe your own bullshit, which the history of the last century should have taught you is flat wrong.

Your entire chain of reasoning depends on the following proposition...

What? For months the Administration has reassured us that it has secret evidence about Iraq's weapons, with many a pundit admonishing sceptics for not trusting the president. For months, the Administration has promised that the release of unequivocal evidence was coming "soon" (only a few days ago Colin Powell said we would see it by the end of this month). After all those promises, we now learn, casually, just by the way, that in fact no such evidence exists.

Of course Saddam has the bad stuff. Only stupid people, liberals for instance, would believe that he has done away with his VX, anthrax, and other biowar toxins. WMD's are the foundation of his regime.

Your whole line of argument is the result of a leak from an unidentified source who, in all probability, knows nothing.

Now, naturally, you can't bring yourself to believe that "Dumbya" might be right, nor can the logic of Condi Rice's piece become apparent to you, simply because you hate Republicans (although the beads of persperation coming off your brow as you actually try to understand anything that Condi Rice writes must be a joy to behold....). But George W. Bush and Condi Rice are both right, you are wrong, and worse yet, you and other liberals have chosen to side with an Islamic Fascist.

That's right, you're siding with the fascists. Which is to be expected. Leftists and fascists are two sides of the same coin.

Or, as Orwell remarked in 1941 about the Pacifists: "To be a Pacifist is to be objectively pro-Nazi."

Now get lost, skank. Go back to performing intellectual fellatio on the Bent One. It's what you're good at.

Be Seeing You,

Chris