Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: traditionalist
I'm not quite sure of the point you're trying to make. Donahue is arguing that adopting CCW laws in high crime, drug infested urban areas would increase crimes such as crack shootouts. This is irrelevent since criminals, particularly crack dealers, would be highly unlikely to apply for, or be granted, CCW permits. In effect, he's arguing that liberalizing carry laws in high crime areas would result in more crimes since more criminals would then carry concealed weapons.
65 posted on 01/23/2003 12:12:59 PM PST by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: DugwayDuke
No, that's not what he's arguing. He's just trying to explain why Lott's findings of that CCW leads to less crime is spurious. One cannot argue from the evidence presented in his paper that CCW leads to more crime.
67 posted on 01/23/2003 12:24:32 PM PST by traditionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson