Way to go Aaron...He tells Scott there is nothing in NEW YORK law which prevents you from discussing this case. "Why were you arrested, Scott?". Ritter refuses to answer, goes into his BS rant about, "I stood before the law", "but I do not stand before you to be judged". Aaron says, "I'm not playing that game..I'm trying to give you the chance to explain what happened, and you know you are radioactive until you do. I submit it's in your interest to get this cleared up".
Ritter says, "the rule of law must apply here". WTF does that mean, anyway?
Ritter is getting antsys to be able to discuss why this leaking came up now.
Aaron takes charge, refuses to let him go into the allegation against the republican judge.
Aaron gives up...says, "you aren't going to tell me why you were arrested at that Burger King".
Ritter says, "I was supposed to be on an airline yesterday to go to Iraq, this is about war and peace, thousands of Americans dying, I was an effective voice in the anti war effort."..
"What's stopping you from going,", aaron asks.
"Distraction, this would have been a disservice", Ritter says.
Well good for Aaron, Ritter did NOT get to go into his rant about the evil republican judge.
Ritter is
But good job Aaron Brown!!! Way good. I'm impressed. But of course, the question is...why did CNN even bother to have Ritter on? They knew ahead of time he was not going to respond to Aaron's questions.
And friends...why did Ritter choose CNN as the place to do his "live" appearance? Because he knew he would get the easiest time of it there.
I listened to some of them today; he was greating ready to CUT TAXES........LOL.
I honestly believe if we give credit where credit is due, we CAN turn things around.
If the card was to be played to distract the useful idiots in the "antiAmericanWar" movement, then why wasn't this information disclosed 2 days prior to the planned protests on Jan 18th?