Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Wesson Introduces Bill To Raise Vehicle License Fees
The KCRAChannel.com ^ | 1/22/03 | AP

Posted on 01/22/2003 2:10:51 PM PST by NormsRevenge

Fees Would Return To 1998 Level

POSTED: 10:08 a.m. PST January 22, 2003 UPDATED: 10:21 a.m. PST January 22, 2003

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Backed by dozens of police and fire chiefs, Assembly Speaker Herb Wesson introduced a bill Tuesday to raise vehicle license fees $115 for the average car and avoid a "public safety disaster" in local budget cuts.

"This is a life and death issue," Los Angeles County Sheriff Lee Baca said as police chiefs, sheriffs, fire chiefs and other law enforcement leaders packed the Capitol news conference room to support the bill.

"There are people who will die because we in law enforcement will not get there in time" if the budget cuts take place.

But Assemblyman John Campbell, the lead Republican on the Assembly Budget Committee, said lawmakers should focus on giving local government more stable revenue sources instead of raising vehicle fees.

He said Republicans would challenge the measure in court if Wesson and other Democrats try to get around GOP opposition by enacting the bill with simple majorities instead of the two-thirds votes usually required for tax hikes.

"Tripling the car tax is simply going to hurt working families and will not solve the budget deficit," Campbell said.

Under Wesson's proposal, fee increases could start hitting motorists' pocketbooks in the last half of this year. The fees could drop once the budget picture improves.

Because the bill just clarifies existing law, means that lawmakers can pass the bill with a simple majority instead of a two-thirds vote, aides to the speaker said. Despite talk of a legal challenge, Campbell does not dispute Wesson's interpretation of the law reducing the fee, which was approved by overwhelming bipartisan majorities of the Assembly and Senate in 1998.

But Wesson's bill could also face opposition in the governor's office if it gets that far. Gov. Gray Davis has been cool to the idea of a fee increase, even though he proposed one last year. He hasn't said he would veto the Wesson bill, however.

Vehicle license fees would be restored to their 1998 level under the bill, which would increase the annual fee paid to register the average car from $55 to $170, according to Department of Motor Vehicle figures.

The approximately $4 billion raised by the measure would replace payments the state makes to local governments to make up for the loss of revenue caused by a series of cuts in the VLF that began in 1998.

Davis has proposed eliminating the so-called back-fill payments to local agencies to help erase a state budget deficit that his administration says totals $34.6 billion and the legislative analyst puts at $26.1 billion.

Spending cuts alone won't solve the state's budget problems, Wesson said, adding that the law that reduced the VLF envisioned it increasing again when the state couldn't afford to make the back-fill payments.

"Everybody agreed on that," Wesson said.

His bill would add teeth to the rollback language in current law by:

Designating the state finance director to determine the state cannot afford the back-fill payments. Current law is silent on who makes that decision.

Saying the state's ability to borrow funds could not be considered by the director in making his finding.

Law enforcement officials said the threat of losing the back-fill payments has already caused some local government administrators to order cutbacks in fire and police services.

Seventy percent of the back-fill now goes to public safety programs, Wesson said.

"The governor's proposal alone has set off a tidal wave of fear and concern," said Newport Beach Police Chief Bob McDonell.

But Steve Peace, Davis' new finance director, said the governor's budget proposals would take smaller percentage cuts out of local governments than state services.

He said local officials should cut other programs if they want to protect public safety.

Raising vehicle license fees now will not solve the state own budget problems and could jeopardize the state's credit ratings and undercut Davis' efforts to raise $8.3 billion sales, income and cigarette taxes, Peace added.

"If the reason for pursing the VLF at this time is (they think) this is the only tax increase they're going to get they might as well give us $8 billion in additional cuts," he said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; licensefees; vlf; wesson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 01/22/2003 2:10:51 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

You want scare tactics? Come to California and listen to the demRatic legislators who hide behind issues like "Public Safety"..

I'd be more concerned about our public safety as a result of all the reckless spending the last few years by socialzits masquerading as representatives only "meaning to do the people's will".

Stalin would be proud...
2 posted on 01/22/2003 2:13:50 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
No increase in taxes, cut your damn budget Davis!
3 posted on 01/22/2003 2:14:45 PM PST by Flashman_at_the_charge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
KEEP AMERICA FREE

DONATE TODAY
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

4 posted on 01/22/2003 2:15:03 PM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Vehicle license fees would be restored to their 1998 level under the bill, which would increase the annual fee paid to register the average car from $55 to $170, according to Department of Motor Vehicle figures.

Based on that, the average car in California is worth only $8500. Good luck if you happen to own a new Lincoln Navigator. Your annual registration fee under this bill would go up to about $1000.

5 posted on 01/22/2003 2:19:36 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Let Wesson know how you feel about his bill. Speaker State Capitol - P.O. Box 942849
Sacramento, CA 94249-0001
(916) 319.2047
fax (916) 319.2147
E-MAIL Speaker@assembly.ca.
6 posted on 01/22/2003 2:22:47 PM PST by kellynla (house hunting in NV...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Repeat after me: Lay off educrats. Lay off educrats. Lay off educrats...
7 posted on 01/22/2003 2:26:01 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
I see reports that the "Republican" Gov. of Nevada is looking at tax increases to make up a 1 billion dollar deficit...

Thanks for the posted info. Go get 'em, Folks!
8 posted on 01/22/2003 2:29:33 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
When I bought a new car in CA in 2000 (admittedly something in the "luxury" class, although hardly a Ferrari), the tags as we used to call them in the south were $600 for the first year. The fees (actually mostly taxes) have since dropped to $244/year as part of the gov's efforts to garner votes in California. My guess is that most states' tags are in the range of $20-$40/year. Under this proposal the tags will go back to about $500/year, I'd guess (drops a little each year as the car depreciates).
9 posted on 01/22/2003 3:06:11 PM PST by JoeFromCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromCA
The whole thing gets me riled. Why do police funds have to come from vehicle fees? Why aren't they coming from property taxes or something more stable like sales taxes? Why punish the working families who need their vehicles just to get to work each day?
10 posted on 01/22/2003 3:20:12 PM PST by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
The funny thing about this particular tax, it won't just affect the "evil" rich Republicans either. Once they raise the taxes (which hopefully, no Republican will EVER vote for) it will also effect not so "rich" Democrats as well who own cars. Hopefully this will lead to a backlash. If not, expect Arizona and Nevada (despite the Repub that wants to raise taxes [looks like California isn't the only state with incompetent Repubs]) to be a little more crowded.
11 posted on 01/22/2003 3:27:54 PM PST by Simmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I've a real good feeling that the good folks of Calif are getting screwed here and it is just the beginning of a very long and nasty fee and tax screwing. And I think they brought most of it on themselves. Hell yeah there good buddy, you gonna vote more liberal dems in power? Idiots.
12 posted on 01/22/2003 3:41:38 PM PST by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
The ONLY reason Davis didn't propose this is because he knew the legislature would.
13 posted on 01/22/2003 4:31:35 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I would love to see an analysis of who this fee will come from, broken down by average annual income. Are the democrats taxing the rich? The middle class working stiff? How big a hit will the poor take? Who is going to be hurt the most by this as a percentage of annual earnings?

A chart would make a great visual for a hard hitting story. Ha! If I think we'll never see a piece like this does that mean I'm a cynic?
14 posted on 01/22/2003 5:22:19 PM PST by concentric circles (Ouch! Is that your hand in my pocket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
I caaaint stand it!!!!

%$^#&&*ing Democrats!!! Arrrgggggghhhhhhhhhhhh

15 posted on 01/22/2003 6:07:20 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Sac Bee running this ..

Davis stops just short of saying he would veto fee increase

Davis stops just short of saying he would veto fee increase

The Associated Press
Published 5:25 p.m. PST Wednesday, January 22, 2003

SACRAMENTO(AP) - Gov. Gray Davis on Wednesday criticized legislation designed to trigger a vehicle license fee increase and head off substantial local government budget cuts, but he stopped just short of saying he would veto the bill.

"I don't think it's wise for governors to rattle sabers," he told reporters. "I don't think I can make my intentions any clearer. I'm not enthusiastic about it. This bill will not solve the immediate task before us, in fact it will complicate the task before us."

The bill, by Assembly Speaker Herb Wesson, D-Culver City, is designed to raise about $4 billion for local government coffers by temporarily rolling back a series of cuts in the VLF that began in 1998.

Under the bill, the annual fee for an average car would jump $115, from $55 to $170, according to Department of Motor Vehicle figures.

The fee increase would replace funds the state gives to local governments to make up for revenue lost by the VLF cuts.

Davis wants to cut off those so-called back-fill payments to help erase a state budget deficit that his administration pegs at $34.6 billion and the legislative analyst says totals $26.1 billion.

The Democratic governor said he might be willing to consider a VLF increase later this year as part of the changes he wants to make in the tax system to protect the state against sharp fluctuations in revenue.

But he said lawmakers' first task is to focus on making budget cuts he has proposed.

Davis is also seeking $8.3 billion sales, income and cigarette taxes. Davis aides say that adopting a VLF increase now could jeopardize those other tax hikes.

On the Net: www.assembly.ca.gov

16 posted on 01/22/2003 6:56:52 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
In other words he is saying:

I have pissed off the voters of California so much that I can't really tell you that I am going to sock you all with as high a tax increase as I can get away with...

17 posted on 01/22/2003 7:52:50 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
But Wesson's bill could also face opposition in the governor's office if it gets that far. Gov. Gray Davis has been cool to the idea of a fee increase, even though he proposed one last year. He hasn't said he would veto the Wesson bill, however.

Ok, this qualifies the author of this piece as a complete political imbecile. Davis has engineered this whole thing so that it's somebody else responsible for the increase, not him. I recall the story of one new aide who was told that Davis always got to deliver the good news (like when the car tax decreased and Davis set it up so that it was done in the form of a refund check with which he got to enclose his personal message), and the departments delivered any bad news. No different this time. Davis is going to sit back and let others take the heat for tripling the car tax. He's not going to veto it, because then the resulting consequences in local budgets would be his fault. I'm sure he'll 'reluctantly' sign it. Or, probably even more likely, he'll let it be enacted by not signing OR vetoing it, which lets it become law completely untouched by Gray hands.

18 posted on 01/22/2003 8:54:56 PM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Spending cuts alone won't solve the state's budget problems, Wesson said, ...

It should more accurately be called the politician's budget problems, since they created it.

19 posted on 01/22/2003 9:05:45 PM PST by judgeandjury (The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"There are people who will die because we in law
enforcement will not get there in time...."

I think the chief of P needs a "P-test"...

20 posted on 01/22/2003 9:11:49 PM PST by dogbrain (TO PROTECT [our pensions] and SERVE [ourselves])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson