You started this battle by calling be "worst" than Ritter. Ritter was caught twice, trying to meet with a 14-year-old and a 16-year-old. He was trolling the internet to find young girls who wanted to watch him bleep himself. You have the nerve to say what you said to me and think I was going to sit back and take it? You were calling me "worst" than a child molester. Yes, I thought an appropriate response to that was ridicule. What would your response have been to charges like that?
You were calling me "worst" than a child molester No, I was calling you worse than Ritter. As I read the reports, there was no 'child' violated in this case. You put 'child' in there and not 'teenager'. You made yourself despicable in this case by taking on the mantle of 'accuser', judge, jury, and 'switch thrower'. Sir, you are not the 'legal' system, we already have one.
I'll copy this on a blank, have it spell checked before I post. But you are having no problem understanding what I'm irritated about. Dammit, I just ended in a preposition!