Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A CA Guy
Well, agree with some of your revulsion, if not ad hominem sentiments.

...redefine morals and ethics DOWN by giving both of those words little value in their limited vocabulary.

I'd particularly feature this statement. I believe this is a consequense of taking an "objectivist" view of ethics and morality. A part of the fundamental discrepancy between American political philosophy and much of libertarian thought is that the former is based upon self-evident truths (including natural law theory of law) while the Ayn Rand style libertarian tries to look only at cause and effect (something unnatural and counterintuitive and prone to resistance and breakdown even in their own minds).

201 posted on 01/24/2003 8:12:26 AM PST by unspun (We were livin' on a high, we chose the chaos, strongman came by, our republic was lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]


To: unspun
I'd particularly feature this statement. I believe this is a consequense of taking an "objectivist" view of ethics and morality.

Have you considered the potential ramifications of making ethics and morality subjective?

202 posted on 01/24/2003 8:31:57 AM PST by tacticalogic (If two plus two equals four, does to plus to equal for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson