[unspun]

but every time the obvious & constitutional solution is mentioned: -- -- That of restoring reasonable regulations [not prohibitions] at state/local levels, -- you simply deny that this is acceptable.

Well, I don't think you'll find unanimous agreement on your interpretation of the limitations of state governments, even among more constitutionally strict and substance-liberal posters.

[tpaine]

"If we could have such a discussion, I might even invite tpaine. Well, afterward, anyway, eh tp?"
-unspun-

How droll.
You claim to want "substantial discussions about pragmatic solutions", but every time the obvious & constitutional solution is mentioned: --
-- That of restoring reasonable regulations [not prohibitions] at state/local levels, -- you simply deny that this is acceptable.
147 tpaine


Well, I don't think you'll find unanimous agreement on your interpretation of the limitations of state governments, even among more constitutionally strict and substance-liberal posters.
"But feel free"

How comical. You've made my point once again.
Do you want pragmatic discussion or unanimous agreement? -- Obviously, in your own words just above, you seek the latter.

Run along now and find someone else to play word games. - Roscoe has vast experience in that silly art.