Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: unspun
I suppose it could be thought of as a test to see ""we"" could come up with rational answers for our People's governance, per this matter.

I'm game, but I do have a question. Any particular reason you've limited the range of allowable discussion in one direction only?

148 posted on 01/22/2003 7:46:38 PM PST by tacticalogic (revved up like a deuce, another runner in the night)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
I'm game, but I do have a question. Any particular reason you've limited the range of allowable discussion in one direction only?

Because the throw weight of um... stict constructionalist... posters in these drug threads already means that it will be virtually impossible to hold a discussion that allows the present drug policy to be defended in its entirity.

At least not without constitutional amendment.

100% current federal policy is out of bounds, as is total laissez faire. (I suppose I could have just said that, but we're not in that thread yet;-)

149 posted on 01/22/2003 8:35:51 PM PST by unspun ("..promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson