To: Types_with_Fist
Just goes to show the difference between men and women. I can't think of too much that is less sexy than watching a guy masturbate. It's not the same the other way around, but there you go. Not only is he a perv, but he's a selfish perv--SHE wasn't going to get anything out of it; that is, if that's all he really wanted, which I doubt.
24 posted on
01/20/2003 4:53:45 PM PST by
wimpycat
(Down with Kooks and Kookery!)
To: wimpycat
Sounds the way the Gooberment does things.. Like Ruby Ridge.. suggest
cutting a shot gun barrel.. and then arresting for it.. Sounds
suspicious to me.. Maybe he was just curious what a "kook" girl like
this would Look like.. Scott is a handsome dude.. and if some girls
knew he was 'looking.. the line would go around the block.. VerrrrY
strage.. The dog didn't bark!.. Ooops that is Sherlock Holmes.. I get
stories confused....
40 posted on
01/20/2003 5:11:06 PM PST by
glowworm
To: wimpycat
I'm guessing he was thinking of getting off just looking at her looking at him. In his perverted mind, if he didn't touch her, he wouldn't be breaking any laws.
The issue now is NOT the details of this thing, but the fact that Ritter's judgement is perverted. That's why NOTHING he says is reliable, either as fact or conclusion.
51 posted on
01/20/2003 5:20:55 PM PST by
savedbygrace
(Jesus is Lord)
To: wimpycat
at a burger king no less... which would be indecent exposure in a public place... what an idiot...
63 posted on
01/20/2003 5:29:46 PM PST by
marajade
To: wimpycat
no need to feel sorry for the undercover officer, she didn't really want sex with Scott.
98 posted on
01/20/2003 7:01:54 PM PST by
Williams
To: wimpycat
Well... harrrumpph... spoilsport... ;0)
100 posted on
01/20/2003 7:12:38 PM PST by
Chad Fairbanks
(We've got Armadillos in our trousers. It's really quite frightening.)
To: wimpycat
Just goes to show the difference between men and women. I can't think of too much that is less sexy than watching a guy masturbate. It's not the same the other way around, but there you go. As a guy, I don't "get" it either. What's the point of meeting a woman someplace, just to end up doing what you can do at home anyway without the rendezvous?
"Watch me", hell, if I meet a woman it's because I want her to participate in some way.
The only thing I can think of is Ritter is some sort of weirdo exhibitionist, who gets off on the shocked/disgusted looks he gets from being a perv in front of girls, pretty much like the common "flasher".
129 posted on
01/20/2003 7:41:03 PM PST by
Dan Day
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson