You're the one who didn't want to "limit opportunities" for youngsters.
And I stated upfront that I knew I was using an extreme example to see where you would draw the line.
Can't you grasp the concept? Or do you simply not care for that specific example?
Okay, how about limiting children's opportunities to drive?
Or to get legally married?
Or to drink alcohol?
Basicly, the same principles apply.
Should it be 18-years-old? 14-years-old? 10-years-old? No minimum???
Where do you draw the line?
I already stated where I would.
And I don't see where it "limits" childrens opportunities...
It only postpones them to a more appropriate level of maturity.
Not at freaking baseball, that's for sure!