TLBSHOW, You must win the case first in order to set precidence, and build from there. This case is the start, not the whole ball of wax. This is my main gripe with you "I gotta have it all right now or I vote for a hopeless .02%r" crowd. This country has to be taken back the same way it has taken away. One step at a time. BUT NO, You knee jerk reactionaries want to blow this perfect opportunity by trying to win it all back in one case.
If these two students win the case, How many more cases simular to theirs do you think will be filed tomorrow?
Think with vision Todd, This is chess not checkers
It is against the constituion when it was started. President can end it.
It is not even a matter of more court dates.
We can end it period.
TLBSHOW, You must win the case first in order to set precidence, and build from there. This case is the start, not the whole ball of wax.Wrong! If "diversity" in any form is permitted to stand as constitutional, there is no progress, because the precedent is a bad one. Constitutional cases are not chess games; such "subtle," "clever" thinking exhausts itself with strategies and tactics, when principles are what are called for. You could win the case, but lose the Constitution. We can't take many more "wins" like that.