I agree, but I'd call it scientific assumptions rather than dogma. All the scientists involved in this issue seem to be of the non-kook variety, and they know that eventually their assumptions will either be confirmed or overturned by increasingly improved observations of nature.
Point taken.
All the scientists involved in this issue seem to be of the non-kook variety
Most, but not all. There's always Tom Van Flandren and his entourage of groupies.