Skip to comments.
China summons Japanese ambassador over disputed islands
Yahoo News ^
| 1-5-03
| Yahoo INC
Posted on 01/16/2003 4:28:15 PM PST by scootshome
Vice minister of foreign affairs Wang Yi summoned Japanese ambassador to China, Koreshige Anami, and made a "formal representation" over Japan's reported leasing of three disputed isles in the East China Sea, state press said early Sunday.
Xinhua news agency said Wang Saturday noted that the Diaoyu Islands -- also known as Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China -- and adjacent islets had been a part of China since ancient times.
"Any unilateral action on the islands by the Japanese side is illegal and invalid, which China will not accept," Wang said. "The Chinese government and people have the unswerving determination to safeguard the country's territorial sovereignty."
Earlier the China Daily said the ministry had summoned an unnamed official from the Japanese embassy Friday to express "strong dissatisfaction" over the issue.
The ministry outlined China's "solemn and just stance" regarding the Japanese government's move to lease from "a private owner" three uninhabited islands, the daily said.
Japan's move is seen as an attempt to strengthen its control over the island chain claimed by Japan, China as well as Taiwan.
The Japanese Yomiuri Shimbun newspaper said Wednesday that the government in October signed a contract to lease the islands for a year from the owner, an unidentified man living outside Okinawa Prefecture.
Japan declared the islands its own territory in 1895 and they were temporarily put under US control after World War II. But they were returned to Japanese rule in 1972 together with Okinawa.
The dispute came to the fore in the early 1970s, when China and Taiwan made their claims to the islands after oil deposits were confirmed in the area by a United Nations agency
(Excerpt) Read more at sg.news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: ancienthistory; ancientislands; china; chinamilitary; commercialshipping; disputedislands; eastchinasea; islands; japeneseambassador; pasific; shipping; war
Do the Chinese think it is time, "while we are thinned out".
To: scootshome
2
posted on
01/16/2003 4:29:30 PM PST
by
Brad’s Gramma
(Rid the country of the Clintons Donate $5 a month to Free Republic.)
To: scootshome
This dispute seems to be about oil.
To: scootshome
4
posted on
01/16/2003 4:34:55 PM PST
by
Rebelbase
To: scootshome
Maybe the chicomms are thinking that. I like to think that a plan for china has been around for a while and we have the resources reservered for just them, regardless of two other fronts. But we did under estimate bin laden(scum). north korea is china's puppet.
To: Rebelbase
You don't think Mr. Cheng-China Huang might have a somewhat prejudiced view of the matter?
To: belmont_mark
PING
7
posted on
01/16/2003 5:15:02 PM PST
by
Orion78
(I hope Golitsyn is wrong)
bttt
8
posted on
01/16/2003 5:40:43 PM PST
by
Tailgunner Joe
(God Armeth The Patriot)
To: RightWhale
This dispute seems to be about oil. Holding my breath waiting for the protestors in Peking with the "No Blood For Oil" t-shirts.
9
posted on
01/16/2003 5:54:47 PM PST
by
Argus
To: Orion78; tallhappy; HighRoadToChina; Jeff Head; maui_hawaii; swarthyguy; Paul Ross; Askel5
Emboldened as they no doubt were by the limp wristed US response to the EP3 attack, and the West's failure to seriously challenge the PRC's illegal occupations of Tibet, NE Kashmir, Woody Island, parts of the Spratley Islands and other small islands and islets in the S. China Sea, naturally, they will continue to push these sorts of things to the limit. When will we (the West and our allies) get a clue that our 50 years of appeasement have been the wrong approach and will never accomplish anything good.
10
posted on
01/16/2003 6:29:07 PM PST
by
GOP_1900AD
(Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
To: scootshome
Do the Chinese think it is time, "while we are thinned out".
Doesn't matter; if the Chinese Air Force and Navy slugged it out over these islands with the Japanese, unless the Chinese used nukes, the Japanese would win.
11
posted on
01/16/2003 7:03:11 PM PST
by
John H K
To: John H K
I wouldn't be so sure. The ChiComs outnumber the JSDF and numbers still count for something.
12
posted on
01/16/2003 8:08:26 PM PST
by
Sparta
(Statism is a mental illness)
To: scootshome
The thought has entered their minds. A rearmed Japan might make that thought go away.
To: belmont_mark
If we challenge the Chinese, where are we gonna buy our underwear from.
They literally have us by the short hairs.
14
posted on
01/17/2003 10:07:42 AM PST
by
swarthyguy
(Do Communists favor fortune cookies?)
To: swarthyguy
If we challenge the Chinese They will have men in orbit by October, but their astronauts will be productive--not having to stop work five times an hour.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson