Skip to comments.
Byrd Fingered in KKK Cover-up
NewsMax.com ^
| Thursday Jan. 16, 2003; 12:03 A.M. EST
| Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
Posted on 01/15/2003 9:15:44 PM PST by Jean S
A Washington, D.C.-based civil rights leader said Wednesday he has uncovered documents indicating that Sen. Robert Byrd, D-WV, was a member of the notorious anti-black hate group the Ku Klux Klan for a far longer period of time than he has admitted.
"Some people say that he was only in (the Klan) for a couple of months," said Kevin Martin, head of the African-American Republican Leadership Council, in an interview on Fox News Channel's "Hannity & Colmes." "But we have documentation that says he was in for almost two years," Martin revealed.
On Monday, Byrd's spokesman Tom Gavin insisted to NewsMax.com that the Senator's days in the Klan, where he served as a Grand Kleagle-recruiter, lasted for just "a number of months" in 1943. Gavin said Byrd came clean about his secret past in a series of private conversations the two had over the last five years.
But according to an expert on the Klan quoted by the Washington Post last year, Byrd was still advising Grand Imperial Wizard Samuel Green on Klan appointments and strategy until at least 1946.
On Monday Gavin maintained that Byrd had told him he had nothing to do with any lynchings or cross burnings during his days in the Klan. But he also revealed that Byrd insists he wasn't ever a racist - not even as a card-carrying member of the night-riding terror group.
AARLC chief Martin vowed that conservative civil rights groups like the Congress of Racial Equality, Project 21, and the Brotherhood Organization for a New Destiny would ferret out the truth about the Democratic Party's ex-Klansman.
"We're going to lay the records out," said Martin. "And it's (the Democratic) Party that is the party of dogs, night-riders and Bull Connors."
On Tuesday BOND chief Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson called for a congressional investigation into Byrd's Klan past, saying his bizarre claim that he was racially tolerant as Klansman undermined his other assertions that he never participated in lynchings or cross burnings.
That's why the top Senate Democrat needs to "explain his relationship with the Klan" to congressional investigators, Peterson said. Any probe into Byrd's activities should cover "not only the actions that he took, but he should identify the people that were involved in the Klan at the time," he added.
"I really would like to see him name the people who participated in the lynchings of black Americans during that time," the Los Angeles-based civil rights leader said. "Because some of those people could still be involved in the legal system of this country making decisions about Americans today. And we need to know who those people are."
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
To: JeanS
*sigh* Once again I get my hopes up only to see the source of the story is NewsMax.
21
posted on
01/15/2003 9:32:46 PM PST
by
dfwgator
To: JeanS; Howlin
22
posted on
01/15/2003 9:32:52 PM PST
by
mass55th
To: Angel
Ping.
23
posted on
01/15/2003 9:33:38 PM PST
by
Jean S
To: dfwgator
Take a look at the wording of that title; we should have known.
24
posted on
01/15/2003 9:34:10 PM PST
by
Howlin
(It's yet ANOTHER good day to be a Republican!)
To: mass55th
I wondered who the "keeper of the Byrd" pictures was......they were missing! Thanks.
25
posted on
01/15/2003 9:34:41 PM PST
by
Howlin
(It's yet ANOTHER good day to be a Republican!)
To: Trueblackman
Good work Kevin, you nailed him ! :-)
26
posted on
01/15/2003 9:36:42 PM PST
by
John Lenin
(Sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me)
BUMP
27
posted on
01/15/2003 9:37:09 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... FReep the Nation This Week-End! ... Donate or Become a Monthly Member Now)
To: JeanS
The RATs who tried to make hay over Lott's foolish remarks are going to be sorry they ever opened this can of worms.
Two Dem Senators, Patty bin Murray and "Sheets" Byrd, are learning that payback is a bitch.
28
posted on
01/15/2003 9:37:17 PM PST
by
Ken H
To: LurkerNoMore!
29
posted on
01/15/2003 9:37:58 PM PST
by
Humidston
(CONTRIBUTE TO FR - NOW! WE NEED MONEY!)
To: John Lenin
Give thanks to the Washington Post.
To: JeanS
And to think Duke only made it to a state level senator......
Imagine how far he'd go if he was a democrat.
31
posted on
01/15/2003 9:40:46 PM PST
by
Bogey78O
(It's not a Zero it's an "O")
To: Trueblackman
But the effect is better when a black republican confronts him on it.
Bwahaha, I love it !
To: JeanS
Time for an all out Freeper assault on the left wing media and the House / Congress critters, no?
This would make a real good issue about now.
Democrat-DemonRat-Demon-Rat.
LVM
To: Trueblackman
You make us all proud. Stay in their face and make them face the truth. The dems are the bigots and racists. And their holier than thou attitude is wearing thin. Wish I was close to D.C. I would join you in picketing the old fart from W.V. and his cohorts in the Senate minority.
34
posted on
01/15/2003 9:46:26 PM PST
by
SwatTeam
To: John Lenin
Its nice to see we are playing some hard ball. We really need to hit this in the media when Byrds Civil war movie comes out where he plays a Civil war general.... icing on the cake.
To: JeanS
To: JeanS
To: Ken H
Hear, hear!!!!!!!
To: Howlin
Me too... just the thought of Byrd being fingered, well, reminds me that it's almost time for me to think about annual prostate exams... and I HATE being reminded of that...
39
posted on
01/15/2003 10:02:54 PM PST
by
Chad Fairbanks
(We've got Armadillos in our trousers. It's really quite frightening.)
To: JeanS
But according to an expert on the Klan quoted by the Washington Post last year, Byrd was still advising Grand Imperial Wizard Samuel Green on Klan appointments and strategy until at least 1946.The New York Times had an article that talked about that in 1971, with excerpts from Byrd's letter to the klan's imperial wizard. The current leadership of the NYT would not be pleased if their original article was used to help burn one of their precious liberals now. Worth digging up.
40
posted on
01/15/2003 10:10:55 PM PST
by
thatdewd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson