[lds23]

There's no lack of clamoring for GW to release this evidence. But he's playing it smart. Waiting to release it until we'll have massive force aligned to quell any uprising by Saddam or his sympathizers.

Checkmate in advance by the US.

The "alternative" view is to let the evidence out now (with the risk that it's leaked to Iraq - perhaps by the Syrians or French?). And THEN they suggest we should begin to send troops. Sounds to me like a recipe to put our troops in danger.

I prefer the way that the administration is playing it, just fine.

[Howlin]

There's no lack of clamoring for GW to release this evidence.

Remember when the Democrats *demanded* that Bush discuss the Iraqi War with them -- last fall, before the election, when he didn't want to (or did he?)

Remember when the Democrats *demanded* that Bush "do something" to show the government was working on 9-11, and he completely reorganized the government and took away their "base" of government works with perks?