Skip to comments.
MARIJUANA DECRIM BILL IN MA GENERAL COURT RIGHT NOW
The Massachusetts General Court (legislature) ^
| this current legislative session
| n/a
Posted on 01/15/2003 9:47:52 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
I'm a freelance journalist, and while researching a project, I came across this bill. If passed, it would represent the beginnings of an Amsterdam-like marijuana decriminalization system in the Commonwealth.
To: MrLeRoy; vin-one
Thought you guys might be interested in this. Please ping your lists.
To: Kevin Curry; Roscoe; Dane; Destructor; robertpaulsen; unspun
Thought you guys might be interested in this.
To: Hemingway's Ghost
In the Year Two Thousand and One?
4
posted on
01/15/2003 9:51:56 AM PST
by
Roscoe
To: *Wod_list
Wod_list pinged.
5
posted on
01/15/2003 9:52:35 AM PST
by
MrLeRoy
To: Hemingway's Ghost
How come this has a 2001 date on it?
6
posted on
01/15/2003 9:53:00 AM PST
by
rhombus
To: Hemingway's Ghost
2001?
...And people just get uglier and I have no sense of time." Bob Dylan
7
posted on
01/15/2003 9:56:02 AM PST
by
rhombus
To: Hemingway's Ghost
It's linked to from a
page that's headed, "House numbers 1201 through 1300 of the 2001-2002 Session." No sign of it in the
2003 docket.
8
posted on
01/15/2003 9:59:35 AM PST
by
MrLeRoy
To: Hemingway's Ghost
To: Roscoe
I think that's the year in which it was first proposed/submitted.
To: MrLeRoy
Further research reveals that MassCann is pushing its members to petition their legislators, especially the new ones in districts where the non-binding decrim ballot questions won overwhelmingly, to make sure the bill is read.
To: Hemingway's Ghost; jmc813
ping to the one who's list is better than mine.
12
posted on
01/15/2003 10:11:44 AM PST
by
vin-one
(I wish i had something clever to put in this tag)
To: Wolfie; vin-one; WindMinstrel; headsonpikes; philman_36; Beach_Babe; jenny65; AUgrad; Xenalyte; ...
WOD Ping
13
posted on
01/15/2003 10:14:24 AM PST
by
jmc813
(My tagline used to say "Go Jets!!!!", but I am now looking for a new one.)
To: Hemingway's Ghost
Really doesn't matter what the state says, the feds say no. I think Arizona passed full legality (sales,growth,consumption) but the feds said no way. So unfortunately we're still doomed to keep paying the extremely high bill for the "War on Drugs".
To: walkingdead
I think Arizona passed full legality (sales,growth,consumption) but the feds said no way. Really? When was this?
To: Hemingway's Ghost
Really? When was this? A new urban myth is born.
16
posted on
01/15/2003 10:44:17 AM PST
by
Roscoe
To: Hemingway's Ghost
Hope to read this soon. I'll try not to make any wisecracks about how appropriate this is for Massachusetts, you know, it being the bastion of conservatism it is and all. ;-`
17
posted on
01/15/2003 10:46:53 AM PST
by
unspun
(One man's marijuana is another man's poison.)
To: unspun
Hope to read this soon. I'll try not to make any wisecracks about how appropriate this is for Massachusetts, you know, it being the bastion of conservatism it is and all. ;-` Thanks---I'm looking forward to your input. Actually, in this regard, you'd be surprised at how "conservative" liberal Massachusetts is. We have several dry towns, and if you live more than approx. 7 miles from a state that allows alcohol sales on Sunday, you still can't buy a six pack on the Lord's 7th Day.
To: walkingdead
I no longer have the article, but not too long this came up in the Freeper discussions. The issue revolved around the States legalizing medical marijuana, and the Feds opposing it. When it went to court, and I think it was the 9th District, I Feds were basically told that that the States didn't have to comply with Federal Laws on this issue. The wording was something to the effect that The Federal Government could not compel State Officers to enforce certain laws. I am very loosely paraphrasing here, so forgive me for not getting it perfect.
To: rhombus
How come this has a 2001 date on it? The legislators were stoned when they were drafting the bill.
20
posted on
01/15/2003 11:01:53 AM PST
by
jpl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson