So, you obviously believe Roe v. Wade was decided correctly.
We're just talking past each other. You continue to argue the case, while I'm arguing the dispute-resolution mechanism. Nothing I've said implies that the procedures will produce "correct" results; only that they are the procedures we have all agreed to so as to implement a 'rule of law'.
There are court decisions every day that somebody, somewhere thinks are "incorrect." Roe v Wade is a famous one. Bush v Gore has its detractors as well. So what? We've all agreed that when these rulings come down, they are the law. You can still be against them, but you also have to live with them.
The right place to fix the copyright issue is in the legislature. Asking small panels of unelected philospher kings to diddle with legislation using their superior wisdom is asking for trouble in the long run.