You -- and many others -- appear to ascribe to the fallcy of alternate syllogism: If not A, then B. If not B, then A.
I condemn Citizen Bush's actions; you conclude that I must approve of General Noriega's. Not so; non sequitur. Your logic is invalid. I can -- and do -- have equal measures of contempt for General Noriega and for Citizen Bush in the matter.
I fail to see why you conclude that I dislike the United States. I criticised the first Bush Administration; how does that translate to general hatred for the Union as a whole? Must I implicitly approve of every action taken by them? Must I support every operation?
If I condemned the United States' involvement in the Balkans under Citizen Clinton, would you demand that I leave? If I remarked that I would boo the former President for the actions taken in Serbia, would you conclude that I would cheer wildly had former President Milosevic appeared in Citizen Clinton's place?