[Shooter 2.5]

I see a big difference here. Cramer doubted Bellesiles so he did some research and found out the author was lying. Now in order to do the "same thing" the left doubts John Lott but expects Lott to prove his findings. That's the difference. If the left thinks that something is amiss, they should be the ones researching the facts.

Typical clintoon tactics. Get your hand stuck in the cookie jar and make counter accusations.

[xm177e2]

They're asking Lott to give evidence that such a survey actually took place. That's basically similar to what Cramer asked of Bellesiles, to show his research. Tim Lambert is not out of line.