Skip to comments.
AOL's Steve Case Resigns
Fox News
Posted on 01/12/2003 3:55:15 PM PST by StopDemocratsDotCom
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
To: stuck_in_new_orleans
What's the error message?
Are either listed in Add-Remove programs, or is it just the folders that remain?
What version of Windows are you running?
61
posted on
01/13/2003 3:28:15 AM PST
by
visualops
("..we could give it all back to you, and hope you spend it right.." -Clinton on the surplus, 1-20-99)
Comment #62 Removed by Moderator
To: StopDemocratsDotCom
Say goodbye to Antichrist On Line!!
To: Timesink
Well I've got to hand it to Case for vision. I mean, he took control of AOL from Sears/HR Block back in the early 90's after they collectively took a $1B bath on the investment when it was just a BBS using old 300-600-1200 baud modems.
If I were him I'd try to do exactly what he did. But you'd think the TW shareholders were smarter than that. They had their own cable interests, too... and the broadband they offered deserved a premium due to speed. It's not like they were novices, they were the directors of one of America's largest and most important companies.
I agree, it was all hype and BS, but I am just surprised that the old TW board didn't see through it. Greed must have blinded them.
To: visualops
Thanks visualops!
65
posted on
01/13/2003 8:39:35 AM PST
by
Timesink
(Poodle: The Other White Meat)
To: visualops
The first year I used AOL, which was in '95...
Psssssssst! You... yeah, you. Never admit you used AOL. It doesn't look good.
66
posted on
01/13/2003 8:58:43 AM PST
by
Bush2000
To: glock rocks
hey steve, you gun grabbin piece of refuse... d'ja get a clue?One of ***MANY*** reasons .45MAN and I quit them 4 years ago. We each had separate accounts, so they lost two paying members.
It never made much sense to us that our browser allowed access to ANY XXX site (plus all of the XXX SPAM our mailboxes would hold!) but restricted access to weapons sites.
I can't wait for the final "flushing" noise as AOHell completes its journey down the toilet!
67
posted on
01/13/2003 10:26:42 AM PST
by
dansangel
(I'm not bitter....really!)
To: dansangel
AOHell! I like that. I will use it in any further correspondences I have with them!
To: SpinyNorman
LOL! Glad I could be of service!
To: All
Separated at birth?
70
posted on
01/13/2003 3:43:39 PM PST
by
nycgal
To: Bush2000
LOL
71
posted on
01/13/2003 3:49:56 PM PST
by
visualops
("..we could give it all back to you, and hope you spend it right.." -Clinton on the surplus, 1-20-99)
To: StopDemocratsDotCom
He, however, got his $160 million from the sale of stock.
72
posted on
01/13/2003 4:20:12 PM PST
by
DWar
To: conservativefromGa
loved the graphic, but it wasn't readable at that reduced size...
And besides once our browsers load it once, it takes no longer to display it full sized
To: monkeyshine
I agree, it was all hype and BS, but I am just surprised that the old TW board didn't see through it. Probably because TW had it's own problems. It's had a very high debt load for over a decade. It needed more and more growth to keep that load from dragging them down. They gambled that the Internet bubble would continue so that the new company's stock price would continue to rapidly grow enough to help reduce that debt load.
74
posted on
01/20/2003 8:31:32 PM PST
by
LenS
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson