I can't say for sure, but I've certainly wondered about the possibility of Clinton setting us up. Consider for a moment the pattern involved: His campaign being funded by Riady, the espionage at our nuclear labs, his support of the KLA in Bosnia, his refusal to take bin Laden into custody, his refusal to do anything about the training camps in Afghanistan. Also, the funny business concerning Oklahoma City and "others unknown." The pattern, I think, is pretty clear. Maybe I'm crazy, but I suspect more than simple ineptitude.
Everything I said has been written about by Bill Gertz, btw. There isn't much foil involved in anything I've stated.
I can't say for sure either, but I also see a very clear pattern starting with the Clintons' deliberately dismantling the security systems in the WH as soon as they were in. Gary Aldrich put it all down to their trying to protect the little druggies in the administration, but I don't think you risk your whole administration for a bunch of goofy little druggies. IMO they were planning to do things that wouldn't stand the light of day.
Then, whenever they were caught at something destructive of America, they would say, "Ooops, bureaucratic SNAFU." They were quite willing IMO to be branded inept and incompetent because the truth would have been much worse for them.
Gertz is the best, and I wasn't trying to imply you were foil oriented. I figured I'd get that label ;^).