Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine

Ok, so if condition were so isolated, in an unrealistic way, I could have a nuke. Ok fine, same goes for crack.


693 posted on 04/02/2006 4:36:13 PM PDT by Texaggie79 (Did I just say that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies ]


To: Texaggie79
There you go tex, connecting the war on weapons with the war on crack, which makes my point.


" -- Most Americans are moving to the idea that drugs and guns are evil and should be prohibited. Encouraging one way of thinking supports the other because the logic of the arguments is the same.

Why not prohibit a dangerous evil? If every drinker is a potential alcoholic, every drug-user a future addict, and every gun-owner a potential killer, why not ban them all? There is no defense against this logic except to challenge the lies that sit at the root of the arguments.
Those are the lies promoted by the prevailing propaganda in support of all Prohibition.
We cannot oppose one and support the other. To do so undermines our efforts because all these movements walk on the same legs. --"

__________________________________


The logical core of the article.

--- Prohibitional power has never been granted to any level of government, federal/state or local.

Governments are limited to legally 'reasonable' regulatory powers by the basic principles of our constitution.
694 posted on 04/02/2006 6:10:24 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 693 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson