[Texaggie79]

But back to the issue. You still are required to give another reason why we can prohibit nukes and bioweapons from private citizens other than "it's reasonable". Because see, I say prohibiting crack is "reasonable". So your argument is moot until you give another argument for why it's ok .

[Mojave]

You still are required to give another reason why we can prohibit nukes and bioweapons from private citizens other than "it's reasonable".

That will be the day.

[tpaine]

But back to the issue. You still are required to give another reason why we can prohibit nukes and bioweapons from private citizens other than "it's reasonable".

There you go again, misreading my position. We can reasonably regulate use/storage of nuclear/biological/chemical materials, [much is privately owned] but we can't constitutionally prohibit possession.

Because see, I say prohibiting crack is "reasonable".

And I've explained why your prohibitions on drugs & guns are unconstitutional.

So your argument is moot until you give another argument for why it's ok.

Neener neener. - Grow up.