Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SONY MUSI CHIEF RESIGNS, ENDING AN ERA
THE LOS ANGELES TIMES ^ | 01/10/2003 | CHUCK PHILLIPS

Posted on 01/10/2003 6:41:37 AM PST by kellynla

Thomas D. Mottola, one of the most recognizable executives in the music business, abruptly resigned Thursday as head of Sony Music Entertainment, instantly becoming a symbol of the recording industry's inability to reverse plunging profits and surging piracy.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: music; sony; tommymottola
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
For a guy who started out in the music industry 28 years ago as a "gofer" and his first major accomplishment was the signing of Hall & Oates in 1975 has done very well for himself eventhough his personal life has been a nightmare.
1 posted on 01/10/2003 6:41:37 AM PST by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kellynla
One low life to be replaced by some other vermin. Yawn. Mega-yawn.
2 posted on 01/10/2003 6:49:36 AM PST by friendly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: friendly
I am sure Mrs. Matolla (Tommy's mother) doesn't think he is a vermin. How much did you make last year and how many jobs have you created in the past eighteen years, geeezzzzz...you jerks on FR who have nothing positive to put forth and put everyone down who is successful...what a bunch of losers...
3 posted on 01/10/2003 7:02:08 AM PST by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Oh, please!!! Do a search on this site, under "Mottola" and see what kind of guy he is.

Calling Mottola "a symbol of the recording industry's inability to reverse plunging profits and surging piracy" is ludicrous. The faltering industry suffers from plain old bad music! They are completely overlooking the baby boomers' musical tastes. Hopefully, there will be many more Mottolas fired in the near future.

4 posted on 01/10/2003 7:04:55 AM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
You obviously know little about the music industry. "Baby boomers" don't buy CD's. The market is thirteen years old and up, sir. And my only point was that Mattola started out as a "gofer" who was "Hall & Oates" first promoter and agent and with little more than undying enthusiasm and ambition became a very successful person in the industry...
5 posted on 01/10/2003 7:13:46 AM PST by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
The music industry really needs to develop an updated understanding of how their markets want to consume music today along with a genuine willingness to service those markets in new ways. Forcefeeding expensive CDs with one hit song and lotsa crap is NOT working (gee....wonder why) and consumers are in full revolt.

A huge database of individual songs, new and old, searchable by artist, year, and song title (maybe other ways, too, that I can't think of) and easily downloadable onto CDs for a per-song charge on a person's credit card is a dynamite idea. If they had been on the ball, the music companies would already have either gotten together on one huge database format or each done their own with the music each controls. I wonder if they have suffered enough declines in profit so that they will start thinking into the future, now. Maybe the new Sony exec will do so.

6 posted on 01/10/2003 7:21:34 AM PST by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irene Adler; kellynla; friendly; TommyDale
>>>A huge database of individual songs, new and old, searchable by artist, year, and song title (maybe other ways, too, that I can't think of) and easily downloadable onto CDs for a per-song charge on a person's credit card is a dynamite idea. <<<

Ironically I read around a year ago that MusicMaker.com, which offers that service, was in bankruptcy or something close to it. Why would that be? Are there similar services? If so, what are they please? Coincidentally I just bought Motolla's ex-wife's Mariah Carey's "Daydream" because it has "Fantasy" on it and the rest of the CD really is garbage.
7 posted on 01/10/2003 7:37:54 AM PST by End The Hypocrisy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Irene Adler
I agree. But we won't hold our breath. It appears that the labels are going to continue to run with the "cRAP" until the last teenager quits buying their music or another prodigy comes on the scene. Nice to know that there is someone like yourself on FR who has something pragmatic to say instead of the usual inane bile that is regurgitated. If parents paid more attention to what their children were buying much of the garbage being bought would stay on the shelves...
8 posted on 01/10/2003 7:44:33 AM PST by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Irene Adler
I agree. But we won't hold our breath. It appears that the labels are going to continue to run with the "cRAP" until the last teenager quits buying their music or another prodigy comes on the scene. Nice to know that there is someone like yourself on FR who has something pragmatic to say instead of the usual inane bile that is regurgitated. If parents paid more attention to what their children were buying much of the garbage being bought would stay on the shelves...
9 posted on 01/10/2003 7:48:12 AM PST by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
sorry for the dbl post...system is verrrrry slow LOL
10 posted on 01/10/2003 7:49:58 AM PST by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: End The Hypocrisy
"Coincidentally I just bought Motolla's ex-wife's Mariah Carey's "Daydream" because it has "Fantasy" on it and the rest of the CD really is garbage."

I have had that happen so many times. Who hasn't?

About the company you cite, I am afraid I don't know anything about its circumstances.

Any company that would put up a huge block of music for fee-downloading would have to have legal title to all the songs, make both finding the songs and downloading as easy as possible to do, and set the right price (couldn't be too high because pirating is "free"). I think it would take a consortium of the big music companies or each big music company on its own to put its entire collection out for a per-song fee.

I feel that if they don't do something like this, so that people can make their own CDs (like they are doing already with pirating) then the music companies are just going to continue to bleed money.

11 posted on 01/10/2003 7:49:59 AM PST by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Irene Adler
The problem with your suggestion is this:
There is really no money in the music!

The money is in the "stars".

Joni Mitchel had it absolutely right when she called it "the star makin' machinery". That is what it is!

If you really return the control of the music selection and purchase to the consumer, without controling the release, the play list, the hype, etc., etc. you lose the real money.

Would anyone buy ANY Brittany Spears "music" without the packaging and the hype?

The music industry simply can't allow the consumers to package their own music. There's not enough money in it!

12 posted on 01/10/2003 7:50:26 AM PST by steve in DC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: End The Hypocrisy
www.emusic.com burn your own CD's for ten bucks a month. Check it out...
13 posted on 01/10/2003 7:56:33 AM PST by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Well, you are probably right. I won't be holding my breath, either. But I really believe something like this could be done, and it could be made both profitable for the industry and great for consumers. As to how they expect their music to be delivered to the consumer, I think the music companies are living in the past.

BTW, my older daughter was once very fond of a group called Nine Inch Nails, I think, or something like that. It seems their stuff was pretty nasty, and I never realized. My daughter has turned out just fine, is happily married, working and in grad school and never was misbehaving at any time she lived at home, either. I never thought to listen to any of the music because she was always a trustworthy girl and a good student. Who knew?

14 posted on 01/10/2003 7:57:32 AM PST by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: steve in DC
But Steve, the music companies could still promote their "stars" and movie soundtracks all they wanted, couldn't they? Concerts would still be given and personal appearances made. MTV would still show music videos. Or is there something I am not understanding?
15 posted on 01/10/2003 8:00:35 AM PST by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Irene Adler
Well I remember in the early 60's hiding James Brown, the Temptations and the Four Tops in the back of my record collection and my mother would tell you I didn't turn out so bad...but the profanity is pretty bad on some of the stuff being recorded over the past ten years...
16 posted on 01/10/2003 8:05:45 AM PST by kellynla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Irene Adler
I feel, perhaps incorrectly, that there is a certain amount of "gate keeping" that goes on with the major record labels.

In their own way, they embargo a lot of music, and control the development and marketing of certain musical styles.

I believe that if they were to allow unfettered access to the music libraries, then musical tastes would develop somewhat less impacted by their promotional flash.

This would likely yield more "stars" fewer "super stars" and an overall reduction in the control over the market that they enjoy and a reduction in their income.

Don't forget, if a music talent doesn't have a major label behind him or her, that talent is going to have a tough time getting much farther than playing every night in some bars.

Broad, internet access to music will remove the big label's hands from the controls.

At least, I think it will.

17 posted on 01/10/2003 9:12:01 AM PST by steve in DC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

18 posted on 01/10/2003 9:12:35 AM PST by Mo1 (Join the DC Chapter at the Patriots Rally III on 1/18/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Pop Music's Diva Maker Ends
His Reign as Sony Music CEO

Thomas Mottola to Create New Label
As Industry Braces for Prolonged Slump

By JENNIFER ORDONEZ
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

Against a backdrop of plummeting music sales, Thomas D. Mottola, the music mogul credited with shepherding hit makers like Mariah Carey and Jennifer Lopez to superstardom, is stepping down as chairman and chief executive of Sony Corp.'s Sony Music Entertainment to start his own label.

The departure of Mr. Mottola, head of Sony's music operations since 1998 and one of the most powerful executives in the music business, has been rumored for months, although the timing took the industry by surprise.

The move comes as profits have sagged at Sony Music and music-industry sales have fallen sharply for the second year in a row. People familiar with the matter say tensions between Mr. Mottola and top management at the Tokyo-based parent company have increased.

Mr. Mottola denied that his relations with Sony Corp.'s top management have been strained. "My relationship with Tokyo has never been better," he said, adding that he had been thinking about leaving for about a year. He said the move was "about me continuing to be in control of my own destiny." With the music industry "in a time of crisis," he added, the opportunities to be successful with a new model "are going to be better than ever."

Sony's world-wide sales and its share of the U.S. music market have held steady over the past year. But its operating income in fiscal 2002 fell 1.6%, and Sony actually lost money for the first two quarters of the 2003 fiscal year. Sony has blamed the declines on digital swapping of songs on the Internet, a major problem for all five major music companies.

[mottola]
AGE: 52
BORN: the Bronx borough of New York
RESUME DETAILS: Joined CBS Records in 1988 as president; named president of Sony Records in 1989; named president and chief operating officer of Sony Music Entertainment in Sept. 1993; appointed CEO in May 1998 and named chairman seven months later
ARTISTS DEVELOPED: Mariah Carey, Jennifer Lopez, Shakira, Anastacia, Marc Anthony, Pearl Jam, among others
CREATED: Sony Music Studios; labels such as Razor Sharp Records and Daylight Records
PERSONAL: Married to Latin pop star Thalia

But Sony also has had difficulty lining up with the public's tastes recently. In 2002, it had only one top 10 album in the U.S., according to Nielsen Soundscan: "Home," from the Dixie Chicks, which went on to sell nearly 3.7 million copies in the U.S. after Sony settled a long-running lawsuit with the group last summer. The company did have strong-selling albums by Bruce Springsteen and Latin crossover pop artist Shakira, one of Mr. Mottola's recent success stories.

Hoping to fight the sales malaise, Mr. Mottola recently had been touting plans to find new potential revenue sources for Sony Music, such as advertising deals involving artists on its labels.

There have been a few such arrangements -- a marketing deal involving Sony artist Celine Dion and Chrysler automobiles, for example -- but the plan hasn't yet come into full view. Mr. Mottola had also talked about Sony Music having a role in managing some artists' careers.

Mr. Mottola's new company is expected to be a partnership with Sony Corp. Mr. Mottola described it as a "total entertainment company" that would include music, marketing, online ventures and management. A person familiar with the matter said Mr. Mottola expects to continue his business and artistic relationships with many top Sony acts he helped develop, including Ms. Lopez, Shakira and Ms. Dion.

The tough-talking Mr. Mottola has long been one of the music industry's most visible players. He joined Sony in 1988 and became chief operating officer of the music group in 1993. While at Sony, he married two pop stars, Mariah Carey, who recorded for Sony at the time, and later, Latin singer Thalia. Last year, Michael Jackson, once one of the company's top artists, publicly called Mr. Mottola "devilish" and launched a series of bizarre public protests against him.

At Sony, Mr. Mottola has sought to operate the music group as autonomously as possible, relying on a close-knit group of executives including Executive Vice President Michele Anthony, who handled much of the business negotiations at the music group, and Don Ienner, chief of Columbia Records. Mr. Mottola, who began his career as a music manager dealing with acts like Hall and Oates, was strongest at shepherding talent, going so far as to select the right producer for a particular song, while many business details were handled by lieutenants including Ms. Anthony.

Mr. Mottola also is known for having one of the industry's most lucrative contracts: People familiar with the matter say he makes more than $7 million annually with incentives that can nearly triple that in a good year.

Mr. Mottola's contract was set to expire in 2004, and he has been in discussions with Sony for several months about his future. But his independence, which Sony's corporate bosses tolerated during more flush times, has increasingly been called into question recently, as the Tokyo brass sought more oversight of the music group, according to people familiar with the matter.

Sony didn't immediately name a successor, but it is expected to do so soon. A person familiar with the matter said the new music chief would come from outside the company. Sony said that Mr. Mottola's successor, who will be named in the next few days, would have a strong business background and financial experience. The knowledgeable person said the remainder of Sony's top music management is expected to remain intact for the immediate future.

Whoever it is, Mr. Mottola's successor will have their work cut out for them. Analysts say the music industry will remain a difficult business for the next few years, and they don't expect things to improve for Sony or the industry at large anytime soon. "There's going to be no topline growth and retail is going to be in worse shape," said Michael Nathanson, at Sanford C. Bernstein & Co.

-- Martin Peers contributed to this article.

Write to Jennifer Ordonez at jennifer.ordonez@wsj.com

19 posted on 01/10/2003 9:20:06 AM PST by TroutStalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
www.emusic.com ? Thanks; I'll check it out.
20 posted on 01/10/2003 9:47:34 AM PST by End The Hypocrisy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson