Skip to comments.
Michael Savage v. Charles Barkley
CNN - TV transcripts ^
| 1/8/03
| transcript
Posted on 01/08/2003 5:20:44 PM PST by modern_orthodox
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-144 next last
To: modern_orthodox
I saw this today. I expected to be impressed by Savage. I wasn't. As a matter of fact, neither of them impressed me. The biggest argument against illegal immigration they could have made is that it's you and I- and the people in that audience- that pay for the prisons to house them, as well as the healthcare that they use. If you want impact on an issue, hit people where they will feel it the most- the pocketbook.
21
posted on
01/08/2003 5:47:01 PM PST
by
rintense
To: bobzeetwin
I know a lot of brilliant people who care nothing about sports.
To: dubyaismypresident
Ha! That was the one comment by Barkley I liked. I've listened to Savage from time to time, but he came off like an bombastic know-it-all today.
23
posted on
01/08/2003 5:48:42 PM PST
by
rintense
To: bobzeetwin
That was supposed to go to post seven. Apparentley we are having a stupid contest. How'm i doin?
To: modern_orthodox
Well, you know, Barkley has a record of intellectual debate, like when he said "That's what I hate about white people," or when he spit on a little girl in New Jersey.
25
posted on
01/08/2003 5:49:55 PM PST
by
B Knotts
To: Jeff Chandler
I know a lot of brilliant people who care nothing about sports Let's assume you are are brilliant. Have you heard of Sir Charles?
To: rintense
you know, I agree with you. savage basically treated the cnn set like his own show, where he gets to yell at people whom he considers stupid (correctly or not) and then hang up on them. barkley, coming from his own mentality, isn't going to back down when someone calls him stupid (correctly or not). so in the end they just ended up screaming at each other - which was entertaining - and, well, whatever...
To: bobzeetwin
'bout as well as I am!
To: modern_orthodox
What's with the names of the people they let ask questions?:
Cabel (ph)
Tykila (ph)
Moja (ph)
To: bobzeetwin
See post # 17.
To: Libertina
No, Barkley
is pretty bright. Ask Rush Limbaugh.
Anyway, Barkley maneuvered an ignorant Michael Savage into saying that Barkley was a dumb jock who was not fit to shine his shoes. Not a good thing for Savage, of course. He loses the argument under the circumstances.
(Besides, Barkley's accent is actually better than most American Blacks.)
31
posted on
01/08/2003 5:54:56 PM PST
by
the_doc
To: Libertina
savage actually mentioned that part of the conversation on his show today...unfortunately, i was listening over the web on KERN and they cut to Davis' state of the state address and wabc here in NY is doing seton hall hoops for some reason so i missed hearing the immigration segment.
To: bobzeetwin
Let's assume you are are brilliant.
You'd be the first to assume that.
To: modern_orthodox
"SAVAGE: Excellent. Can you please tell me -- what's your education level?"
"BARKLEY: This is what I do. I went to Auburn University. I went to Auburn University."
Yeah. I went to the Sorbonne. Then, later that afternoon I went to the Eiffel Tower. Barkley does not seem to have earned a degree, even though he was giving the chance for a free education as a fine university.
To: Jeff Chandler
OK I give ....You win. I think I like you. I win in the stupid dept. You win in the debate dept. Sports fans are different people.
To: rintense
I agree - one conviced against their will is of the same opinion still - It seems to me that he could use a little more tact if he really wants to get his point across.
His untactful approach only turns off those who are sitting on the fence or who are uneducated. Is he more interested in winning the battle or the war?
36
posted on
01/08/2003 5:58:27 PM PST
by
M. Peach
To: the_doc
For a brilliant guy, he seemed to have a hard time figuring out why 30% of prisoners being illegal aliens suggests a problem. Does he not comprehend disproportionality?
37
posted on
01/08/2003 5:58:30 PM PST
by
B Knotts
To: the_doc
No, Barkley is pretty bright.
He's actually quite intelligent, but his grasp of the issues is rather spotty, probably due to intellectual laziness brought on by the instant wealth he acquired through his tremendous athletic talent.
To: rintense
Ha! That was the one comment by Barkley I liked. You never heard him say: his mom say "the Republicans are the party of the rich..
To which he said "but mom, we are rich now"
39
posted on
01/08/2003 6:00:36 PM PST
by
NeoCaveman
(Charles Barkley for president in 2008!)
To: B Knotts
But, Barkley is supposed to be conservative. Rush loves him. What happened?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-144 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson