- DOUBLE-HELIX HOAX 2
by Mia T, (written in 1999 and 2000) -
NOTE, 10.23.06: This story has an interesting moral dimension and exposes clinton disdain for blacks, for the underclass, for women... and perhaps even for kids. That said, this story is too tabloid and pursuing it would only reinforce (1) the leftist stereotype of clinton foes and (2) the notion that the clinton scandals are no more than the wild inventions of a nutty right wing.
|
-
- Curioli suggested that presenting a "protected sequence"; i.e., an altered version of actual DNA information, is commonplace in the fields of genetic and virological research as a matter of industrial security. In a president's case, the need for DNA confidentiality could be more pressing.
-
The Secret Service seems acutely aware of this need. When the President took a few sips of beer during a photo-op at a pub in Manchester, England in 1997, Mr. Clinton's security detail wasted little time confiscating his glass as he departed. Reportedly, the Secret Service smashed the glass and were concerned that Clinton's fingerprints and DNA could fall into the wrong hands.-
-
Clinton Paternity 'Test' Called into Question Carl Limbacher, January 18, 1999
-
There is NO way the FBI would have released the clinton's unaltered presidential DNA sequence into the public domain. -
- Thus, the Star-Magazine-financed paternity test proved ABSOLUTELY NOTHING -- ZERO -- about the paternity of Danny Williams.
-
- On the other hand, Stephanopoulos' '92 reaction, Clinton's non-reaction, Clinton's lifelong history of sexual predation and Clinton's generalized, effortless exploitation of the weak and vulnerable, including women and blacks--especially women and blacks! strongly suggest clinton paternity.
-
- It would be simple for an enterprising media type or politico or even some anonymous, hand-shaking voter to swipe some cells.
I mean, the Secret Service cannot possibly protect each and every one of the zillions of cells constantly being sloughed off by the lizard. A few strands of his Brillo or shedding scales would do. (Think doublestick tape.) |