Buchanan Interviews Galloway

MSNBC

[Inyokern]

A few minutes ago, Buchanan and Press interviewed British MP George Galloway regarding his views on Iraq. Galloway, naturally, was against any military action against Saddam Hussein. Buchanan seemed to cheer him on.

Strangely, Pat Buchanan gave no indication whatsoever that George Galloway is perhaps the farthest left and most anti-American member of the British parliament (and that is quite and accomplishment).

Check out this link on Galloway:
http://www.thekafir.co.uk/galloway.htm

[Shermy]

Very clever name of that site ".thekafir.co"

The usual way these guys are bought off is through speaking fees, honoraria, or moneys to spouse or family members.

Could be Saudi money too. The article linked below is the best analysis of why OPEC is against a "war" in Iraq. They profit from the sanctions regime. Indeed, opposition to the removal of WMD from Iraq is "about oil."

OPEC, Russia and Iraq

"...The ideal outcome for Russia is exactly the same as that for Saudi Arabia and OPEC, i.e. maintenance of the status quo and the sanctions regime on Iraqi oil. Thus, Russia's opposition to a U.S. invasion of Iraq is completely rational..."

[Shermy]

www.thekafir.co.uk

[swarthyguy]

Thanks..interesting site...

[Poohbah]

Is it my imagination, or has Buchanan gone completely off his chump since 9/11/01?

[Cincinatus]

So Pat Buchanan once again makes common cause with a kook and political loon, huh? Absolutely shocking!

[Willie Green]

Why? Because PJB supports defending our borders and you do not?
IMHO, you're the one who is off his "chump".

[Poohbah]

Why? Because PJB supports defending our borders and you do not?

No, because he's interviewing raging lefty nutcases who think Kim Jong-Il is an agrarian reformer.

BTW, I do advocate defending our borders--I just don't want it done at the expense of our ability to actually fight and win wars, which is what YOU advocate.

[Nick Thimmesch]

Go Pat, Go!

[Willie Green]

I just don't want it done at the expense of our ability to actually fight and win wars, which is what YOU advocate.

You're right, Poopster. I'm adamently opposed to your conversion of NATO forces for use as a UN sanctioned globo-police force. I firmly believe the United States should retain sovereign control over our armed forces.

[Poohbah]

I'm adamently opposed to your conversion of NATO forces for use as a UN sanctioned globo-police force.

I'm adamantly opposed to lying sacks of fecal material such as yourself. I say "screw the UN" and sing the praises of unilateral action on behalf of US interests.

[Inyokern]

Is it my imagination, or has Buchanan gone completely off his chump since 9/11/01?

Anyone who still thinks Buchanan is a conservative should be disabused of that notion after seeing the cordial reception he gave the loonie leftist Galloway.

[Willie Green]

Yeah, right. Except when you start whining about us having the most ill-equipped military on the face of the planet when it comes to defending our own southern border. Poopster, your hypocrisy is showing.

[Digger]

Anyone who still thinks Buchanan is a conservative should be disabused of that notion after seeing the cordial reception he gave the loonie leftist Galloway.

I saw Hannity schmoozing all over Susan Estrich (sp) so there is no need to call him conservative.

[Poohbah]

Yeah, right. Except when you start whining about us having the most ill-equipped military on the face of the planet when it comes to defending our own southern border.

Sorry, Willie...high-tech military forces ain't the kind of force you use for interdicting mostly unarmed illegal immigrants. A force structure similar to the Chinese People's Liberation Army--lots of infantry on foot--would be better if you were to insist on using military troops.

Of course, then we wouldn't be able to fight and win wars, so my point is now proven--and you're still a worthless lying sack of fecal material.

Poopster, your hypocrisy is showing.

Willie, your stupidity has always shown through clearly. Stick to extorting money from your fellow citizens to fund your maglev fetish--at least, in that respect, you're no MORE idiotic than the other train freaks.

[Willie Green]

. A force structure similar to the Chinese People's Liberation Army--lots of infantry on foot--would be better if you were to insist on using military troops.

All the high-tech motion detection, night vision, infra-red, communication and rapid deployment capabilities that we have available, and you come up with this lame excuse. Thanks for proving my point, Poopster.

[Willie Green]

Lame excuses, Poopster.
That's all you're good for.... lame excuses.

[Poohbah]

Lame excuses, Poopster.

Sez Willie Green...without any explanation of WHY they're "lame excuses."

Willie, I have no idea why you insist on starting flame wars with me. But that's about all you're ever good for...that, and panhandling for tax dollars to support your maglev fetish.

So, with all respect due to you...go have an improper relationship with yourself.

[Willie Green]

Maybe it has to do with your lethargic bureaucrat mentality.
I've spent all of my career in the private sector,
and am more accustomed to those instances when one finally
has to call a spade a spade just to clear out the deadwood.
Frankly, your "no-can-do" attitude just isn't my cup of tea.