To: Physicist
Thank you very much for addressing this layman's questions. Oddly enough (or perhaps because you did such a good job explaining), I comprehend what you've presented. The reference to super-string theory (and I'm familiar with brane theory also) is interesting since I have 'constructed' in my own 'imagination' a scenario that takes a differed perspective to the 'extra wound up' dimensions Kaku describes. Again, thank you for the cogent explanation.
186 posted on
01/10/2003 10:00:48 PM PST by
MHGinTN
(A vacuum is really not an empty thing, especially if it can be imagined.)
To: PatrickHenry
Self-search bump.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson